Managing IP is part of the Delinian Group, Delinian Limited, 8 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX, Registered in England & Wales, Company number 00954730
Copyright © Delinian Limited and its affiliated companies 2023

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Greece prepares for trademark reform


In the latest international briefing for Greece, Manolis Metaxakis evaluates upcoming reforms to trade mark law in the country

A new law on trademarks will soon come into effect in Greece, implementing Trademark Directive No. 2015/2436. Although this is definitely good news, there are a few difficulties in parts of the relevant law, where the mere implementation of the Trademark Directive is deemed insufficient. For instance, according to Article 47 of the bill, which is not an implementing provision, the Trademark Office (administrative authority) as well as the administrative courts are the competent authorities for trade mark matters, including oppositions, revocations and invalidity proceedings. On the other hand, the civil courts have exclusive jurisdiction to rule upon infringement actions.

According to the same bill, a non-use defence will now be available to the defendant in infringement proceedings. More specifically, Article 40 of the bill, provides that the proprietor of a trade mark shall be entitled to prohibit the use of a sign, only to the extent that the proprietor's rights are not liable to be revoked on the basis of non-use at the time when the infringement action is brought. If the defendant so requests, the proprietor of the trade mark shall furnish proof that, during the five-year period preceding the date of bringing the action, the trade mark has been put to genuine use in connection with the goods or services in respect of which it is registered and which are cited as justification for the action, or that there are proper reasons for non-use, provided that the registration procedure of the trade mark has not, at the date of bringing the action, been completed under five years ago.

Do the Greek courts have jurisdiction to rule upon a trademark's non-use? Article 47 says "no", while Article 40 says, "yes, for the needs of the infringement action under consideration." Although it is true that the bill does not introduce a mechanism identical to the one relating to EUTMs enforced in Greece, where specialised IP courts do have jurisdiction to rule upon cancellation and invalidity claims, it is equally true that it is departing from the long-lasting division mechanism applicable in Greece. In purely legal terms, departing is good, as long as you know where you want to go.


Manolis Metaxakis

Patrinos & Kilimiris

7, Hatziyianni Mexi Str.

GR-11528 Athens


Tel: +30210 7222906, 7222050

Fax: +30210 7222889

more from across site and ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers wish the latest manual had more details on Federal Circuit cases and that training materials for design patent examiners were online
Counsel are eying domestic industry, concurrent PTAB proceedings and heightened scrutiny of cases before institution
Jack Daniel’s has a good chance of winning its dispute over dog toys, but SCOTUS will still want to protect free speech, predict sources
AI users and lawyers discuss why the rulebook for registering AI-generated content may create problems and needs further work
We provide a rundown of Managing IP’s news and analysis coverage from the week, and review what’s been happening elsewhere in IP
A technical effect must still be evident in the original patent filing, the EBoA said in its G2/21 decision today, March 23
Brands should not be deterred from pursuing lookalike producers, and an unfair advantage claim could be the key, say Emma Teichmann and Geoff Steward at Stobbs
Justice Mellor’s highly anticipated ruling surprised SEP owners and reassured implementers that the UK may not be so hostile after all
The England and Wales High Court's judgment comes ahead of a separate hearing concerning one of the patents-in-suit at the EPO
While the rules allow foreign firms to open local offices and offer IP services, a ban on litigation and practising Indian law could mean little will change