Podcast: Zacco and Managing IP explore early IP implications of NFT infringement

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Podcast: Zacco and Managing IP explore early IP implications of NFT infringement

Sponsored by

Zacco_360 IP_RGB.jpg
mip-podcast-zacco-600-400.png

Senior reporter Max Walters is joined by Hampus Adlerton and Thomas Mølsgaard of IP firm Zacco to discuss everything IP owners need to know about the latest topic on everyone’s lips – NFTs

 

 

Sales of NFTs have seen an incredible growth over the past couple of years – from $95 million in 2020 to almost $25 billion the following year.

But, despite this huge growth, it’s still very much a ‘wild west’ at the moment.

In this podcast Managing IP is joined by resident experts from IP firm Zacco who delve into some of the biggest intellectual property issues that we know about, and also consider those we don’t.

Which companies might best benefit from NFTs? What enforcement options are available? How do NFTs tie in with the metaverse? Is legislation keeping up to speed with these unprecedented changes?

To learn all this and more about how NFTs are reshaping the IP landscape, check out our 20-minute podcast by clicking on the link above.


molsgaard-thomas-120px.jpg

Thomas Mølsgaard

Thomas has more than 20 years of experience advising both domestic and international organisations on the legal and commercial implications of their intellectual property rights, helping them through the IP lifecycle from identification to enforcement, online, offline or through the courts.

An experienced litigator, his detailed knowledge of IP, Business and Commercial Law, combined with his skills in anti-counterfeiting and online brand infringement have helped countless clients to maintain, secure and protect the value of their brand identity and IP rights.


adlerton-hampus-120px.jpg

Hampus Adlerton

Hampus is an expert in the legal, strategic and business aspects of intellectual property, marketing and branding strategy. He counsels clients through the development of their innovation and product/brand development processes, assisting with identification, clearance and enforcement of their ideas and branding IP.

Working with a mix of start-ups, multinational corporations and everything in between, his clients often commend him on his commercial awareness and ability to engage with all stakeholders, from employees to customers and partners, in identifying and developing the value of their rights.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Tim Gilman, who joined Kasowitz alongside three other partners, says he is excited to be part of the firm’s ‘elite’ litigation team
A backlash against a White House video promoting deportation and Casalonga opening a new office in Düsseldorf were also among the top talking points
The firm has brought on board two counsel and an associate to complement two previously revealed partner hires
Bradford Newman, who has joined the firm’s new Silicon Valley office as head of complex technology disputes, discusses plans to build the practice group and attract local talent
Managing IP summarises the highlights from the IP STARS rankings for copyright and IP transactions work, the final firm rankings release of the year
Developments included the first judgment from the Nordic Baltic division, an injunction covering the UK, and a new code of conduct
Alston & Bird acted for InterDigital, while Samsung was represented by Fish & Richardson, during the arbitration process
Powell Gilbert lawyers reveal how they navigated parallel EPO proceedings and collaborated with European peers to come out on top in the Nordic-Baltic Division’s first judgment
The firms posted increases in revenue and profit per equity partner, with both giving a nod to their IP expertise
EasyGroup, the owner of the easyJet airline, said in a press release that UK-based first-instance judges are “less experienced”, bringing a long-running debate back to the fore
Gift this article