Managing IP’s China IP Special Focus 2022 launched

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Managing IP’s China IP Special Focus 2022 launched

editorial-adobestock-16451032.jpg

Managing IP has partnered with leading IP experts to share knowledge and solutions on China’s IP landscape in 2022

The fourth amendment to China’s Patent Law came into force on June 1 2021 reflecting the need to strengthen IP protection. There are many highlights of this revision that the IP experts will explore in depth as well as a wide range of other relevant developments in China’s IP terrain.

AFD China Intellectual Property Law Office discuss the development of the law regarding OEMs and trademark infringement in China while Beijing East IP consider why adopting and promoting a Chinese equivalent of a foreign language mark is critical for foreign businesses to shine in China’s market.

Administrative actions are an important tool for IP protection in China. CCPIT Patent and Trademark Law Office discuss how they can be used in practice and what advantages they offer. Chang Tsi & Partners explain why Chinese enterprises dealing with SEP litigation should respond actively to ensure the issue is litigated before the Chinese courts.

DEQI Intellectual Property’s article focusses on why the patent prosecution highways programme is the most and active international cooperation programme in patent examination around the world. While Kangxin explain why applicants and patentees should understand the functionality of the compensation system for the patent protection term

Liu Shen & Associates provide an analysis of IP cases decided by China’s Supreme Court and consider the characteristics of each. Panawell & Partners explain why the patent evaluation report plays an important role in patent infringement litigation.

Vivien Chan & Co explain how brand owners can benefit from the changes introduced by the CNIPA including reducing bad faith filings and Wanhuida Intellectual Property provide an insight into obtaining evidence on the infringing product/process and the calculation of damages in China.

We hope you enjoy hearing from the IP experts on a wide range of topics in the China IP Special Focus 2022.

Click here to read all the chapters from Managing IP's China IP Special Focus 2022 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As concerns around the little-known litigation tool increase, practitioners say they are educating their clients on how it can be most effective
Kilburn & Strode and Mewburn Ellis are just two firms that have invested heavily in office space – a sign that the legal industry is serious about in-person working
In major recent developments, Dyson snagged another win against Hong Kong-based competitor Dreame and a new AI-powered UPC platform was launched
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Anita Cade, head of Ashurst’s IP and media team in Australia, discusses why law firms that can pull together capability across different practice areas and jurisdictions stand to gain
INTA’s CEO says London-based firms have registered fewer delegates compared to past meetings in San Diego and Atlanta, and questions the 'ethics' of trying to participate without registering
Lobbies and interest groups are among the interveners in a major dispute over whether courts can set patent pool rates
Benoit Geurts and Coreena Brinck will help the firm ‘accelerate its innovation agenda’, according to its managing partner
News of a trademark row over Taylor Swift’s ‘The Life of a Showgirl’ and Nokia’s expansion of its IoT licensing programme were also among the top talking points
IP attorneys share how the Cox v Sony ruling impacts their counselling strategies, and if the case could influence how courts may assess liability for AI platforms
Gift this article