DABUS: South Africa issues first-ever patent with AI inventor

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

DABUS: South Africa issues first-ever patent with AI inventor

artificial-intelligence-min-final.jpg

Despite the world first, South Africa’s IP office does not formally examine patents – so the registration could yet be opposed

South Africa has become the first country to issue a patent designating an artificial intelligence tool – DABUS – as the inventor and the machine’s owner as the patent owner.

The patent was published in South Africa’s Patent Journal yesterday, July 28, with legal representatives Ryan Abbott and Von Seidels both confirming the news.

However, South Africa does not offer formal examination and instead requires applicants to merely complete a filing for their invention. The same patent has already been rejected in the UK, the US and at the EPO.

Related stories

The invention was generated by DABUS (Device for the Autonomous Bootstrapping of Unified Sentience), which was created by Stephen Thaler, CEO of Imagination Engines. He has now been listed as the owner of the patent in South Africa.

In an interview with Managing IP, Thaler described DABUS as human-like, saying it is “sentient and develops ideas”. DABUS-created inventions include an emergency warning light and a food container that improves grip and heat transfer.

With the patent now officially granted by the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission, South Africa’s IP office, it is open to objection based on novelty and inventiveness.

Abbott – who has led a group of attorneys on behalf of DABUS and Thaler – hailed it as a crucial development in AI.

“We see this issuance as a key step towards recognition of the importance of encouraging individuals and companies to make, develop and use AI to generate socially valuable innovations.

“As AI continues to advance and to increasingly perform human sorts of activities, this will result in a host of challenges and opportunities for businesses, including with respect to disputes.”

The patent is the subject of parallel pending proceedings including in the US, UK, Germany, Australia and at the EPO.

Abbott himself argued in one of the cases this week at the England and Wales Court of Appeal, which is hearing the case after the High Court upheld a UKIPO ruling that DABUS could not be deemed the inventor of the patent.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Exclusive data reveals law firms are failing to go above and beyond for their corporate clients, with in-house counsel saying advisers should consider more transparent billing processes
Arty Rajendra and Gary Moss discuss why ‘thorough and intense’ preparation, plus the odd glass of wine, led to a record FRAND victory for their client
Monday’s coverage includes news of a potentially 'game-changing' trademark development in China and how practitioners are using AI
Managing IP gives a taster of the numbers behind this year’s IP STARS trademark rankings, and looks back at our 2025 award winners
Updates from IP offices, the shifting requirements of in-house counsel, and news of London 2026 were among major talking points on Sunday
Etienne Sanz de Acedo discusses the association’s three-year plan, what he is looking forward to in San Diego, and why London came calling for 2026
Professionals from three organisations reveal what led them to sponsor Brand Action and why doing so can build camaraderie
The results of a UK government consultation on the exhaustion of IP rights and an annual review published by the EPO’s Boards of Appeal were also among the top talking points this week
The decision disregards Perlmutter’s work at the US Copyright Office and comes at a time when strong leadership and expertise are crucial
Sources say the decision to fire Shira Perlmutter raises constitutional concerns and speculate on what the decision could mean for the country’s approach to AI
Gift this article