Daimler and Nokia settle SEP ‘holy war’

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Daimler and Nokia settle SEP ‘holy war’

daimler.jpg

The settlement resolves all FRAND litigation between the two companies, including a referral to the Court of Justice of the EU

Nokia and Daimler have signed a patent licence agreement and settled all pending litigation, including a referral made to the Court of Justice of the EU, it was announced today.

Under the agreement, all the cases between the Finnish telecoms company and the German car maker filed in Mannheim, Munich and Düsseldorf will come to an end, and Daimler will withdraw its antitrust complaint at the European Commission.

This settlement brings a long-fought battle over standard essential patent (SEP) licensing in the automotive space – once described as a "holy war" – to an abrupt conclusion, dashing hopes of a legal answer to the end-point versus component-level licensing debate.

The deal sets out that Daimler will make payments to Nokia for licences to the latter’s mobile telecommunications technology, although the terms of agreement will be kept confidential, as agreed between the two parties.

Jenni Lukander, president at Nokia Technologies, said: “The agreement is a hugely significant milestone which validates, once again, the quality of our patent portfolio, the contribution of Nokia’s R&D to the connected vehicle industry, and the growth opportunities for our automotive licensing programme.”

Related stories

The news comes just over a month after Daimler and Conversant settled their connected cars dispute.

Over the past couple of months, the EPO and the Federal Patent Court in Germany have upheld the validity of Nokia’s patents, potentially spurring Daimler to settle its dispute with the Finnish telecoms firm.

In November 2020, the Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf referred Nokia’s case against Daimler to the CJEU to get further clarity on the SEP dispute between the two companies.

In August, Germany’s Mannheim Regional Court ruled that Daimler had demonstrated unwillingness to take a fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory licence to Nokia’s LTE technology patents, and rejected a request from Germany’s Federal Cartel Office to refer legal questions to the CJEU.

After that first big loss for Daimler, Eeva Hakoranta, chief licensing officer at InterDigital in Finland and former head of IP at Nokia, said it was as if Daimler was marching its suppliers into a holy war by insisting on component-level licensing.

The announcement today did not clarify whether the settlement will help resolve a US antitrust case between Continental (one of Daimler’s suppliers) and the SEP licensing platform Avanci.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Stephen Yang joins us for our ‘Five minutes with’ series to explain why his role requires him to wear many hats
The complaint follows a declaratory ruling issued by the England and Wales High Court last month that said Samsung is entitled to an interim licence
Tobias Hahn explains how the firm's multi-jurisdictional setup enabled it to secure an injunction on behalf of Fujifilm relating to defendant Kodak’s non-UPC activity
Reckitt Benckiser is to divest its Essential Home business, which includes more than 70 brands, to private equity firm Advent International
Litigator Neel Chatterjee, who has joined the firm as a co-leader of the IP team, reveals tech ambitions and expansion plans
A settlement between Philips and Transsion and a loss for AstraZeneca in the UK were also among the top talking points
Working with Harvey and Microsoft, the firm has been at the forefront of developing AI tools for its lawyers, and is now exploring new projects and business models
The Emotional Perception AI case, which centres on the patentability of an artificial neural network, will be heard next week
Developments included a court order related to InterDigital’s anti-anti-suit injunction against Disney, and clarification on recoverable costs
Partners at Foley Hoag examine how recent CJEU jurisprudence may serve as a catalyst for recalibrating US judicial reluctance to entertain foreign patent claims
Gift this article