CPA Global hit with new class action claim

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

CPA Global hit with new class action claim

class-action-600-comp.jpg

The IP services provider overcharged clients for renewals in a “deliberate and systematic” scheme, the lawsuit claims

Intellectual property services company CPA Global has been accused of substantial overcharging in a class action complaint brought by a medical device company on behalf of itself and around 100 other CPA clients.

In the complaint, filed at the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, New York-based Brainchild Surgical Devices claimed CPA overcharged for renewals and issued “opaque invoices” to conceal this.  

The complaint further alleges that CPA uses similar contracts and pricing structures for all, or nearly all, of its clients in a “deliberate and systematic scheme”.

A spokesperson for Clarivate, which acquired CPA Global in 2020, said it “categorically and emphatically denies any wrongdoing”.

“The fees for our services are defined in our agreements with our customers, and we adhere to those agreements fully,” the spokesperson added.

According to the complaint, filed on May 2, Brainchild entered into an agreement with CPA for managing maintenance payments for its registered, and in some cases pending, patent and design rights around the world.

CPA, Brainchild alleges, agreed to charge a fixed fee of $200 per payment plus CPA’s costs on top.

However, according to the complaint, CPA’s invoices “made it difficult for Brainchild to determine the actual costs incurred in making payments, and thus difficult to tell if Brainchild was being overcharged”.

The complaint includes several examples of renewals work undertaken by CPA at various IP offices, including at the EPO and CIPO, Canada’s IP office. In each case, there were “undisclosed overcharges” of between $214 and $610, the complaint alleges.

It is not the first time CPA has been accused of overcharging – in 2016, the company was sued in a separate class action lawsuit in the US.

According to the latest complaint, in October 2017 the Eastern District of Virginia approved a $5.6 million settlement that went to then-class members.

Brainchild is seeking an order requiring CPA to reimburse any wrongfully obtained funds, damages and attorneys’ fees, as well as an order preventing it from continuing “unfair and deceptive” business practices.

In its complaint Brainchild states that if CPA were to change its billing practices, it might retain the company in the future to manage international patent registration payments.

The Clarivate spokesperson added: “We consider the allegations of overcharging in the new class action to be a deliberate attempt to tarnish our good business reputation and we vigorously defend ourselves against any such vexatious speculation.”

 

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The move marks the latest step in Temu’s push to protect brands’ intellectual property by collaborating with industry groups and enforcement agencies. Managing IP learns about a rapidly scaling strategy and two success stories
A counterfeiting crackdown targeting fake FIFA World Cup merchandise and new partner hires by CMS, HGF and Winston Strawn were also among the top talking points
Law firms need to accept the hard truth: talent migration isn't personal; it's business as usual
Judge Alan Albright is to leave his role at the Western District of Texas, and could return to private practice
Stobbs has successfully seen off a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
After almost a quarter of a century, Marshall Gerstein has a new managing partner
Abbott winning another round against Sinocare and Menarini, and 'long arm' clarification on the UK's position within the UPC, were also among major developments
Maria Peyman, head of IP at Birketts, explains why the firm is adopting a ‘seamless approach’ for clients by integrating two of its practice areas
Matthew Swinn, who leads the firm’s IP practice, discusses why Mallesons is well-placed to remain a major IP force
Lawyers at A&O Shearman analyse developments regarding UPC’s long-arm jurisdiction, including its scope and jurisdictional limits
Gift this article