A welcome return to the world of trademarks in Somalia

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

A welcome return to the world of trademarks in Somalia

Sponsored by

spoor-fisher-400px.png
flag-2529106-1920.jpg

Matthew Costard of Spoor & Fisher welcomes the news that trademark registration is possible, once again, in Somalia

For many years it was not possible to register trademarks in Somalia, an east African state with a population of roughly 16 million. This was a consequence of a brutal civil war that started in 1991 and continued for many years. The best that international brand owners could do was publish cautionary notices in Somalian newspapers.

Things have, however, been changing for some time. In December 2019, it was announced that the Registry, the Somali Intellectual Property Office (SIPO), had re-opened. The pre-1991 legislation is again recognised, although we understand that new IP legislation (with transitional provisions that will recognise existing rights) is in the pipeline. The pre-1991 legislation is the Trade Mark Law No. 3 of January 22 1955, amended by Law No. 33 of January 18 1975 and Law No. 3 of December 8 1987.

In short, trademark registration is again possible. 

Here are some important features of the current trademark registration system: 

  • The working language of SIPO is English;

  • As Somalia is not a member of the Paris Convention, priority claims are not possible;

  • A pre-filing search is mandatory – this search will be conducted by SIPO; 

  • The Nice classification system is followed and a separate application must be filed for each class of goods and/or services; 

  • In compliance with local Islamic law, it is not possible to cover alcoholic or pork products;

  • As for formalities, the following documentation is required: a power of attorney (simply signed); a copy of the applicant’s business registration certificate or equivalent; a copy of a home or foreign trademark registration; a company profile setting out the applicant’s business activities and jurisdiction of operation. All these documents must be in English or accompanied by an English translation;

  • Trademark applications are examined on absolute and relative grounds;

  • Trademark applications are advertised online;

  • There is provision for opposition – the opposition term is 45 days;

  • The registration term is 10 years; and

  • There is provision for trademark infringement claims. Remedies available to the trademark owner include damages and an order for the destruction of infringing goods. 

The situation regarding the pre-1991 registrations is unclear. Some believe that these registrations are no longer recognised. Others claim that these registrations can be revalidated on payment of an official fee of $1,000 for each renewal term. This is a grey area and you should speak to a professional specialising in African IP if you wish to explore this issue further.

The fact that the trademark registration system is again functioning is very good news, especially for those international brand owners who think that post-civil war Somalia may be a country worth investing in!

 

Matthew Costard

Partner, Spoor & Fisher

E: m.costard@spoor.co.uk

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Tilleke & Gibbins topped the leaderboard with four awards across the region, while Anand & Anand and Kim & Chang emerged as outstanding domestic firms
Gift this article