The 50 most influential people in IP 2020

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The 50 most influential people in IP 2020

mip-50-banner-600x400px.png

Managing IP reveals its pick of the top people driving intellectual property law, policy and business this year

The list is in five categories, which you can access individually by clicking the links below. A profile of each person featured can be found in these sections, along with links to separate interviews for some. The full list of names is at the end of each section. 

The categories:

20 industry leaders >

9 public officials >

8 judges >

7 IP authorities >

6 notable individuals >

Despite the coronavirus pandemic – and in several instances, because of it – there have been a lot of important developments in the intellectual property world this year.

Several courts ruled that standard essential patents could be licensed at the end-product level. Companies opened their IP portfolios to spur COVID-related innovation. Firms dumped racially charged brands. IP judges experimented with virtual hearings and trials – and they worked well.

The events of this year will undoubtedly go on to shape IP law, policy and business for the foreseeable future – and we felt it was important to recognise the people who drove this change, or made a significant contribution to it in some way.

This year’s list of the 50 most influential people in IP features an array of political figures, judges, in-house counsel, IP office leaders and notable figures from all walks of life across Europe, North America and Asia.

Without giving it away, the list includes a judge who wrote the book on virtual trials in a North American country, a public official who nearly derailed Europe’s chances of a harmonised patent system, and two in-house lawyers who were in seventh heaven after a high court copyright win.

It is worth noting that anyone whose main job involves working for a law firm was not eligible for the list; they are rated and ranked in many other places (including IP STARS).

The names were picked by Managing IP’s journalists with some assistance from our readers. The list is not intended as a definitive ranking, but rather the start of a debate, so we have simply organised the top 50 into five categories and then in alphabetical order.

Congratulations to those who featured this year! If you would like to compare this year’s list to 2019’s, click here to see last year’s list.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Tim Gilman, who joined Kasowitz alongside three other partners, says he is excited to be part of the firm’s ‘elite’ litigation team
A backlash against a White House video promoting deportation and Casalonga opening a new office in Düsseldorf were also among the top talking points
The firm has brought on board two counsel and an associate to complement two previously revealed partner hires
Bradford Newman, who has joined the firm’s new Silicon Valley office as head of complex technology disputes, discusses plans to build the practice group and attract local talent
Managing IP summarises the highlights from the IP STARS rankings for copyright and IP transactions work, the final firm rankings release of the year
Developments included the first judgment from the Nordic Baltic division, an injunction covering the UK, and a new code of conduct
Alston & Bird acted for InterDigital, while Samsung was represented by Fish & Richardson, during the arbitration process
Powell Gilbert lawyers reveal how they navigated parallel EPO proceedings and collaborated with European peers to come out on top in the Nordic-Baltic Division’s first judgment
The firms posted increases in revenue and profit per equity partner, with both giving a nod to their IP expertise
EasyGroup, the owner of the easyJet airline, said in a press release that UK-based first-instance judges are “less experienced”, bringing a long-running debate back to the fore
Gift this article