What does the new Industrial Property Law mean for trademarks?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

What does the new Industrial Property Law mean for trademarks?

Sponsored by

olivares-400px.jpg
Stack of papers documents in archives files with clip papers on table at offices,  Busy offices and Pile of data unfinished folders on office desk indoor near window,  Business concept.

On July 1 2020, and as a result of the entry into force of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), the new Federal Law for the Protection of Industrial Property was published, abrogating the current Industrial Property Law. It will come into force on November 5 2020.

Some of the most relevant changes in the new Federal Law for the Protection of Industrial Property regarding trademarks are the following:

  • Use in Mexico of a trademark is not required in order to apply or achieve registration. Therefore, if there is no use, it is possible to file a trademark application on an intent to use basis. However, if a trademark is already in use in Mexico and a date of first use is declared, under the new Law, if the owner of the trademark registration does not prove the truthfulness of the date of first use declared, the registration may be declared null and void.

  • Trademark applications filed after November 5 2020 will be subject to a single examination, and not two exams as currently happens. Therefore, once Mexico's Trademark Office conducts the relevant examinations, it will issue an official communication on formal requirements (information and documents) and relative and absolute grounds for refusal (legal impediments or prior rights on record), as well as informing the applicant of eventual oppositions filed by third parties.

  • If an opposition is filed during the prosecution of a trademark application, the time period in which to respond to it will be four months after the applicant has been notified of the opposition, instead of the one month time period in the current IP Law.

  • Trademark registrations that are granted after November 5 2020 will be valid for 10 years from the granting date, and not from the filing date, as currently occurs.

  • Coexistence agreements are expressly allowed in order to achieve a registration to overcome refusals due to prior rights. Therefore if a coexistence agreement is submitted, this is enough to achieve a registration for a trademark application.

  • Partial non-use cancellation actions are not allowed by the Mexican Trademark law currently in force. However, under the new law, trademark registrations granted after November 5 2020 can be partially cancelled due to lack of use, only with respect to the protected goods and services that are not in use.

garcia-mariana.jpg

Mariana García

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The firm reveals how its litigation strategies informed the arguments that took Masimo’s judgment past $818 million
The firm was rebuilding its IP practice through a string of patent hires and a Texas expansion, but its dissolution has put the newly built talent back into the market
AI can exploit longstanding gaps in copyright protection at remarkable speed, but EU law still provides tools to fight back, says Simon Hembt at Bird & Bird
The firm has tapped a local patent trio to establish a foothold in the market and broaden its national presence
New Asia-Pacific IP head Jonathan Chu is eyeing opportunities arising from Chinese technology licensing, overseas enforcement and increasingly IP-heavy cross-border deals
Europe’s largest intellectual property convention and trade fair is back: IP Service World 2026 takes place in Munich from November 23–25 – the 16th edition, with 1,400-plus attendees from 55-plus nations, 100-plus speakers, and 100-plus exhibitors. Three days. Two focused areas. One IP marketplace.
Mehmet Gün and Uğur Aktekin discuss four decades of change in Türkiye’s legal market, the firm’s commitment to independence and the challenge of building an institution that can outlast its founders
Boehringer Ingelheim has instructed a team from Kirkland, while Teva is being represented by Pinsent Masons
The Delhi High Court’s latest directions offer an opportunity to move beyond remedies against bad-faith registrations and address how suspicious applications are identified in the first place, says Fatima Baig at Lexlinc
Camilla Hamrin describes how the acquisition by Acapo Onsagers will impact Bergenstråhle’s trademark practice – and reflects on changes she has seen over 30 years in IP
Gift this article