What does the new Industrial Property Law mean for trademarks?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

What does the new Industrial Property Law mean for trademarks?

Sponsored by

olivares-400px.jpg
Stack of papers documents in archives files with clip papers on table at offices,  Busy offices and Pile of data unfinished folders on office desk indoor near window,  Business concept.

On July 1 2020, and as a result of the entry into force of the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA), the new Federal Law for the Protection of Industrial Property was published, abrogating the current Industrial Property Law. It will come into force on November 5 2020.

Some of the most relevant changes in the new Federal Law for the Protection of Industrial Property regarding trademarks are the following:

  • Use in Mexico of a trademark is not required in order to apply or achieve registration. Therefore, if there is no use, it is possible to file a trademark application on an intent to use basis. However, if a trademark is already in use in Mexico and a date of first use is declared, under the new Law, if the owner of the trademark registration does not prove the truthfulness of the date of first use declared, the registration may be declared null and void.

  • Trademark applications filed after November 5 2020 will be subject to a single examination, and not two exams as currently happens. Therefore, once Mexico's Trademark Office conducts the relevant examinations, it will issue an official communication on formal requirements (information and documents) and relative and absolute grounds for refusal (legal impediments or prior rights on record), as well as informing the applicant of eventual oppositions filed by third parties.

  • If an opposition is filed during the prosecution of a trademark application, the time period in which to respond to it will be four months after the applicant has been notified of the opposition, instead of the one month time period in the current IP Law.

  • Trademark registrations that are granted after November 5 2020 will be valid for 10 years from the granting date, and not from the filing date, as currently occurs.

  • Coexistence agreements are expressly allowed in order to achieve a registration to overcome refusals due to prior rights. Therefore if a coexistence agreement is submitted, this is enough to achieve a registration for a trademark application.

  • Partial non-use cancellation actions are not allowed by the Mexican Trademark law currently in force. However, under the new law, trademark registrations granted after November 5 2020 can be partially cancelled due to lack of use, only with respect to the protected goods and services that are not in use.

garcia-mariana.jpg

Mariana García

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Junior lawyers aren’t unwilling to work hard, as some seniors believe; rather, they are rejecting traditional career advancement models that have limited payoff
Rebekah Gay discusses overcoming self-doubt, supporting the next generation of women lawyers, and how changing client demands are reshaping IP practice
New filing data suggests Germany's grip on UPC litigation remains strong, while Bardehle Pagenberg, Arnold Ruess, Hogan Lovells and Carpmaels notch up notable cases
In 27 years, KASS has expanded to seven countries in southeast Asia and is now eyeing further growth opportunities. Its CEO shares her perspective
Mine Güner discusses bridging law and business, taking the initiative, and why Taylor Swift helped put copyright on the map
Cindy Goh discusses why she launched Cheang & Ariff's IP department, the improving litigation environment in Malaysia and what to consider when using AI
Increased focus on adding patent litigation depth to the firm’s Dallas office was behind the boutique’s most recent hires
IPH's Canadian acquisitions are paying off on paper, but a couple of strong years may not be enough to show that the group's strategy has truly won over the market
Examiner statistics could help patent prosecution practitioners tailor strategies, turning an area of high variability into a potential competitive advantage
The England and Wales High Court’s ruling in Accord v Novartis may not rewrite the law on plausibility, but it does signal a pragmatic approach that could provide greater certainty for life sciences innovators
Gift this article