Brazil: How has the Madrid Protocol been implemented and what next?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Brazil: How has the Madrid Protocol been implemented and what next?

Sponsored by

daniel-400px.png
握手をするビジネスウーマンとビジネスマン、締結、成約、契約

On October 2 2019, Brazil joined the Madrid protocol. The success of this can be proven by numbers.

Until March 5 2020, 3,126 marks were designated to Brazil. The United States, the European market, China, Great Britain and Germany were the top filer countries. Thus far, most applications have come from well-established companies with worldwide reach, such as GSK, BMW, Syngenta Group, Apple, Luis Vuitton, Roche and others.

These numbers are expected to rise when the Protocol is fully implemented but, unfortunately, there are still important procedures pending including the multiclass system, co-ownership and division of applications/registrations. These procedures were scheduled to come into effect on March 9 2020 but were postponed indefinitely by the BPTO.

Another important point is the publication of international designations in the BPTO Official Bulletin.

In accordance with Brazilian law, all designations need to be locally published opening a 60 day term for the filing of oppositions, which are also published, opening another 60 days term for the filing of counterarguments. Up until now no publication has yet taken place which means that (1) applications filed within the protocol are likely to take much longer to be analysed than locally filed applications and (2) it is too early to anticipate the problems that these applications will encounter and how they will be analysed by the BPTO.

Furthermore, there is a catch concerning oppositions as they will only be published locally and will not be displayed on the WIPO portal which means that it is wise to have a local agent monitoring Brazilian designations.

Hiccups aside, once these problems are solved the Protocol will undoubtedly be an important tool to be used by companies to protect their trademark rights in Brazil.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

PepsiCo was represented by PwC, while the Australian Taxation Office was advised by Australian-headquartered law firm MinterEllison
The firm said revenue from its ‘refreshed and expanded’ IP team increased by 4% in FY25
As revenue reporting season hits full stride, firms have made a point of highlighting the successes of their IP teams as they take centre stage in big-ticket work
GSK and CureVac will together receive $740 million, as well as royalties on sales of COVID-19 vaccines in the US
The firm, which represented Getty in one of the most closely followed copyright cases in recent years, said IP was among its standout practice areas
The decision to divide was partly due to differing visions over the impact of technology on IP work, according to one partner
The Bar Council of India’s warning to Dentons Link Legal and CMS IndusLaw shows why foreign firms are right to worry about India’s legal market
News of a trade secrets leak involving TSMC and an action in Japan against AI startup Perplexity were also among the top talking points
Rothwell Figg partner Leo Loughlin discusses the importance of pro bono work and why ‘For the Kids’ should not be monopolised for trademark purposes
A new consultancy firm, set up by a former Warner Bros and Netflix lawyer, aims to resolve tensions between AI developers and the creative industries
Gift this article