Microsoft settles Windows dispute

Microsoft settles Windows dispute

Sam Mamudi, New York

robertson-sep04.jpg

Michael Robertson

In the latest of a series of settlements with its rivals, Microsoft is to pay $20 million to protect its Windows trade mark in a potentially damaging infringement case.

On July 16, the software leader reached an agreement with US technology company Lindows Inc that will see Lindows change its corporate name to Linspire by September 14. Lindows will also stop using all Lindows marks, including those that appear in its Linspire operating system.

In exchange, Microsoft will pay Lindows $15 million by August 15. An additional $5 million will be paid on February 1 2005, when Lindows will transfer a number of domain names, including lindows.org, lindowsinc.net and lindowsinc.org to Microsoft.

"We are pleased to resolve this litigation on terms that make business sense for all parties," said Michael Robertson, chairman and CEO of Lindows, who was recently named as one of MIP's 50 most influential people in IP. According to a filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission, Lindows has debts of $13.5 million.

Microsoft has been pursuing its case against Lindows across the world. The dispute began in December 2001, when Microsoft sued Lindows for trade mark infringement, claiming that the Lindows name infringed the Windows trade mark. Since its first action in the US, Microsoft has also filed suits in Finland, Sweden, the Netherlands, France, Spain and Canada. Such was the pressure that Lindows faced that in February it changed its name to Lin?-s (pronounced Lindash) in the Benelux countries, Finland and Sweden, and in April to Linspire across Europe.

There have been suggestions that Microsoft sought a settlement after events in the US case seemed to have turned against the company. In February, Seattle district court judge John Coughenour suggested that the mark's validity should be based on how generic the Windows mark was before the product's first release in 1985, a ruling that was affirmed by an appeal court.

But Microsoft dismissed such suggestions. "We remained confident in the merits of our case, but we are often interested in resolving disputes before they get to trial," said a company spokesperson.

microsoftsign1-may04.jpg

Microsoft's Seattle headquarters

"I think the Windows trade mark is defensible," said Mark Shull, president and CEO of MarkMonitor, a trade mark identification and brand monitoring company. "In my opinion, they just decided that it wasn't worth the negative publicity of losing a case, even though I, and many IP attorneys that I have spoken to, think that they'd win on appeal. They probably just figured to spend $20 million, and be done [with Judge Coughenour]."

Jim Rosini, chair of the trade mark practice at Kenyon & Kenyon, said that part of the problem for Microsoft is its management of the Windows trade mark.

"For instance, you rarely see 'Windows-brand operating system', using the mark as an adjective. Instead it is used as a noun, as in 'Windows XP' or getting a Windows upgrade. You should never use a mark as a noun. If they keep doing that, Windows will become generic, just like Kleenex, aspirin, elevator and all the other words that used to be trade marks," he said.

Microsoft's spokesperson responded that the company does not comment on its legal strategies, but added: "We will continue to vigorously defend our trade marks whenever necessary - as we have in this case."

Meanwhile, Microsoft has said that it plans to increase its patent filings by more than 50% in the coming financial year.

Speaking at the annual Microsoft Financial Analyst Meeting, chairman Bill Gates said that Microsoft plans to apply for 3,000 patents in the year ending June 30 2005.

Such a figure would propel Microsoft alongside IBM as the leading patent filer at the US Patent and Trademark Office.

The New York Times reported that Gates said patents were a "very important part" of the company's "cycle of innovation".

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

News of an alliance between two Malaysian law firms and the launch of a self-help video aimed at supporting IP professionals through menopause were also among the top talking points
Speakers at the EUIPO’s IP Mediation Conference discussed how lawyers can act in tandem with clients during mediation, and the importance of showing a united front
A report that revealed top legal LinkedIn influencers are generating hundreds of thousands in advertising value is the push lawyers need to up their social media presence
Speakers at the EUIPO’s Mediation Conference say mediation can offer a ‘cathartic’ and effective alternative to litigation that IP owners should consider
Partner Scott Sudderth says he is looking forward to building strong client relationships and expanding the firm’s patent practice
Find out which firms secured the most nominations for Managing IP’s Asia-Pacific Awards 2025, ahead of the winners being revealed on November 6
Raluca Vasilescu joins our ‘Five minutes with’ series to discuss patent mining and watercolour painting
Jan Phillip Rektorschek, founding partner at Pentarc in Germany, explains why the firm broke away from Taylor Wessing and discusses its plans for staying competitive
Royal Mail Group wins copyright and database right infringement case, in a dispute that can be linked to the history of postcodes in the UK
Managing partner Mark O’Donnell explains why people are at the centre of the Australian outfit’s investment focus and how being independent benefits the firm
Gift this article