Apple and Samsung drop non-US patent litigation

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Apple and Samsung drop non-US patent litigation

The global patent battle between Apple and Samsung has elicited tens of thousands of news stories around the world. Their decision to end the litigation everywhere outside the US was revealed in a two-line statement today

apple20samsung20phones20200.jpg

“Samsung and Apple have agreed to drop all litigation between the two companies outside the United States,” said Samsung. “This agreement does not involve any licensing arrangements, and the companies are continuing to pursue the existing cases in US courts.”

The move marks the end of pending litigation in South Korea, Australia, Germany, France, Italy, the UK, the Netherlands, and Japan.

The litigation between the two smartphone makers has proved lucrative for firms of lawyers and patent attorneys around the world. You can read about the firms acting for Apple and Samsung, as well as other players in the smartphone patent battles, in Managing IP.

In May this year a California jury chose to leave the total damages awarded to Apple against Samsung at $119.5 million in a case related to the related to the Korean company’s Galaxy S2 smartphone. The amount was far below the $2 billion Apple was seeking.

The jury also awarded Samsung damages of $158,400 for Apple infringing its '449 patent for recoding and reproducing image and speech. The jury found, however, that Samsung's '239 patent for a remote video transmission system had not been infringed. Samsung had been seeking $6 million in damages.

Florian_Mueller_Foss_Patents

Analyst Florian Müller (pictured left) wrote on his FOSS Patents blog that Apple may file a third US Apple v Samsung lawsuit. But he added: “that appears less likely to me than another possibility. It may very well be that at this point Apple just hopes for a somewhat face-saving exit by collecting a significant damages award (or, more likely, obtaining a settlement before it gets there) based on, for the most part, design patents.”

While the patent battles between Apple and Samsung have been raging, the South Korean company has been notching up sales of its smartphone products, particularly outside the United States. In the first quarter of this year Samsung shipped twice as many smartphones as its US rival, according to Strategy Analytics.

The same analysts reported last month that the Android operating system used by Samsung now has an 85% share of the global smartphone market.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article