EU Customs seize 36 million fake goods

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

EU Customs seize 36 million fake goods

The number of fakes seized by Customs officials in Europe fell last year for the second year running

The authorities detained nearly 36 million fake goods at EU borders in 2013. That was down from almost 40 million in 2012 and a steep drop from the 178 million articles seized in 2008.

China remained the number one country of provenance for suspected IP-infringing goods sent to the EU. Clothing came top of the list for fake products, accounting for 12% of the overall amount, followed by other goods (11%), medicines (10%), cigarettes (9%), packaging materials (9%) and toys (8%).

More detentions than ever are being made following requests from IP owners. In 2007 Customs received just over 10,000 applications for action. Last year that number had more than doubled to 26,800.

But ex officio actions have fallen as a percentage of total actions by Customs. In 2009 they accounted for almost 10% of Customs’ actions but by last year that figure had fallen to just over 3%.

Statistics revealed in a report from the European Commission show that counterfeiters and their customers are increasingly turning to mail and courier services for delivery of their products.

Cases related to postal and courier traffic accounted for 72% of all detentions. Packages were largely filled with gods such as sport shoes, bags and wallets, clothing, sunglasses and watches. In terms of number of articles detained in postal traffic, medicines remained for the fourth consecutive year the top category with 19%.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
Gift this article