Twitter paid $36 million to avoid patent lawsuit with IBM

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Twitter paid $36 million to avoid patent lawsuit with IBM

Twitter paid $36 million to avoid a patent infringement suit with IBM, according to SEC documents made publicly available on Thursday

twitter-logo.jpg

Last month, the two companies announced they had reached an agreement that settled a 2013 claim by IBM that the microblogging site infringed on three of its patents. But the financial terms of the deal were not disclosed.

The cost of the transaction was revealed last week when the SEC published Twitter’s Form 10-K, an annual disclosure of a company’s financial performance. The document also revealed that Twitter now owns 956 patents and has another 100 patent applications pending. Before it filed its IPO in November, Twitter owned just nine patents.

The dispute first became public in October last year, when Twitter revealed in its S-1 filing that IBM had invited it to "to negotiate a business resolution of the allegations.”

In the filing, Twitter wrote: “We believe we have meritorious defenses to IBM's allegations, although there can be no assurance that we will be successful in defending against these allegations or reaching a business resolution that is satisfactory to us.”

The patents at issue were US Patent No 6,957,224, relating to the efficient retrieval of uniform resource locators; No 7,072,849, relating to a method for presenting advertising in an interactive service; and No 7,099,862, relating to programmatic discovery of common contacts.

Under the deal announced in February, Twitter agreed to purchase more than 900 patents from IBM. The two companies also reached a cross-licensing agreement.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Frederick Lee has rejoined Boies Schiller Flexner, bolstering the firm’s capabilities across AI, media, and entertainment
Nirav Desai and Sasha S Rao at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox explore how companies’ efforts to manage tariffs by altering corporate structures can undermine their ability to assert their patents and recover damages
Monika Żuraw, founder of Żuraw & Partners, discusses why IP should be part of the foundation of a business, and taking on projects that others walk away from
Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Plasseraud IP says it is eyeing AI and quantum computing expertise with new hire from Cabinet Netter
In the fifth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss the ‘Careers in Ideas’ network and how to open access to the profession
McGuireWoods’ focussed experimentation and disciplined execution of AI tools is sharpening its IP practice
Gift this article