High collecting society fees may be an abuse, says CJEU

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

High collecting society fees may be an abuse, says CJEU

The Court of Justice of the EU has ruled that the monopolies enjoyed by national collecting societies to collect copyright royalties are lawful, but that imposing high fees may amount to an abuse of a dominant position

The Court also ruled that a Czech law that exempted health establishments from paying royalties for music played to their guests was incompatible with the EU Copyright Directive.

The Court’s ruling, handed down today, relates to a row between Czech collecting society OSA and a thermal spa called Mariánské Lázně.

The dispute began when OSA tried to force the spa to pay royalties to it for providing guests with facilities to watch TV and listen to music in its rooms. Mariánské Lázně refused on the basis that Czech law allows medical establishments to make such broadcasts without paying royalties.

A court in Pilsen, the Krajský soud v Plzni, asked Europe’s top court whether the exemption granted to medical establishments by Czech law is compatible with EU law and whether the monopoly that OSA has within the Czech Republic for collecting royalties is compatible with the freedom to provide services and EU competition law.

It also asked the Court to consider a fundamental question about the way collecting societies operate across Europe: whether the monopoly that OSA has within the Czech Republic for collecting royalties is compatible with the freedom to provide services and EU competition law.

Today the Court decided that the monopoly that OSA has to collect royalties in the Czech Republic does amount to restriction on the freedom to provides services, since the spa was unable to choose to pay copyright fees to another collecting society. However, it said that the restriction is justified because there is no better way, at the moment, of protecting copyright in the EU.

Although the Court said that the monopoly granted by the Czech legislation to OSA is compatible with the freedom to provide services, the ruling may not be all good news for OSA. The Court said that if a collecting society charges fees that are appreciably higher than those levied in other member states, it could indicate that the collecting society is abusing its dominant position. Whether there is such abuse in this case will be for the referring Czech court to decide.

The ruling comes in the same month that EU member states adopted a directive on the way that collecting societies work. The directive on collective management of copyright and multiterritorial licensing of online music was adopted by the European Council unanimously last week (although some member states made statements about how they interpreted the new rules).

The directive will allow multi-territorial licensing of online music services and should increase the transparency of collecting societies by setting out minimum standards for the way they are governed and the timeliness with which they pay royalties to rights holders.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
The court ruled against the owner of the ‘Umbro’ mark, despite noting that post-sale confusion can be a legitimate ground for infringement
Shem Otanga discusses the importance of curiosity and passion, and why he would have loved to have been a professional recording artist
Practitioners say the Bombay High Court shouldn’t have refused well-known trademark recognition for TikTok simply because the app is banned in India
In-house counsel explain why firms should provide risk management advice that helps them achieve their goals
Attorneys at four firms explain the AI trends they expect in the future, including a potential shift in who plaintiffs sue for copyright infringement
Gift this article