Supreme People’s Court suspends Castel damage award

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Supreme People’s Court suspends Castel damage award

The French wine maker, which had been found liable for infringing the mark of a Chinese winemaker, has received a temporary stay of the damage award handed out by the Zhejiang Higher People’s Court

Castel had been ordered to pay RMB33.73 million ($5.5 million) in damages to a wine importer who held the registration to a popular Chinese transliteration of its brand, Ka-Si-Te (卡斯特).

Castel appealed the decision to the Supreme People’s Court. According to Decanter.com, the court granted the stay after it found that the Zhejiang Higher People’s Court applied the law incorrectly.

The Supreme People’s Court’s decision is expected later this year.

Shanghai-based wine importer Panati and its subsidiary Cavesmaitre registered the Ka-Si-Te mark in 1998, which was approved in 2000. Castel started distributing its wine in China in 1999 using the Ka-Si-Te mark. Though it had registered the Latin alphabet “Castel” mark, it did not attempt do so for Ka-Si-Te.

In 2005, Castel initiated cancellation proceedings against Cavesmaitre for the Chinese mark on grounds of non-use. Cavesmaitre then counterclaimed for trade mark infringement, prevailing before the Zhejiang Intermediate People’s Court and then again on appeal to the provincial Higher People’s Court.

For Managing IP’s coverage and analysis of the case, click here.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The tie-up could result in the firm’s German and France-based teams, which both have strong UPC expertise, becoming independent
News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Gift this article