Interview: Sharon Israel, AIPLA president-elect

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Interview: Sharon Israel, AIPLA president-elect

Sharon Israel takes over as AIPLA President during this year’s Annual Meeting. She has already identified a few areas to focus on during her tenure, as revealed in an interview with Michael Loney

sharonisrael.jpg

Sharon Israel will take over the role of President from Wayne Sobon during this Annual Meeting. One area she would like to focus on is member outreach and helping to enhance the value that members receive from AIPLA.

“We have a lot of members and I would like to focus on being able to reach as many of them as possible and to help support the value that our members get from AIPLA,” she says. “One thing I would like to do is improve and enhance opportunities for members, such as making AIPLA more accessible to people locally. This is especially about targeting younger lawyers and law students. Those are groups of which only a fraction have the ability to attend our stated meetings.”

Some AIPLA committees are good examples of what Israel is talking about. She says the New Lawyers Committee has done a good job of holding local receptions, and even organizing retreats. “We might be able to use the model that they’ve established and try to roll out more local events in that regard.”

The Women in IP Law Committee is another example. It holds an annual networking dinner, but also puts on events in various cities throughout the world.

In addition, the IP Law Associations Committee potentially provides a good opportunity for outreach. “I think we might be able to use that committee as a way to help reach out to local and regional associations and their membership and try to use them to help raise awareness of what’s going on, for example, in IP legislation. So it is about helping to educate,” says Israel. “We can also offer assistance to our local members, in terms of speaking resources and the like.”

AIPLA’s members look to the association to guide them through changes in the IP world. This can be a fast-moving area, especially when trying to keep on top of potential legislative changes.

“It has been a bit of a tumultuous time in the past few years,” says Israel. “One of the services that I do really want to focus on is to provide guidance on some of the policy issues that we address on the advocacy side. We do this very well but obviously it is going to be very important in the next year, with everything that’s going on in the courts, on the Hill, internationally, or even changes that are happening at the USPTO and the Copyright Office.

Israel is a partner with Mayer Brown in its Houston office. Her practice has an emphasis on patent litigation, opinion work and client counseling. She has been involved with AIPLA since 1992 and was first a Committee Chair in 1995. She has been Chair or Vice-Chair of seven committees, served on the Board of Directors between 2005 and 2008 and since 2011 has been a member of the Executive Committee.

“To me, AIPLA operates very well as a meritocracy. Oftentimes the way people rise up through the association is they do committee work, they get noticed as being a good volunteer and a good contributor to the Association, and thus get noticed as being good leaders,” she says. “If you do a good job and make sure you have got those kinds of leadership skills you are well positioned to be tapped to move up in the organization.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article