Develop your online enforcement strategy

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Develop your online enforcement strategy

In-house counsel discussed the most effective response to online infringement at two sessions at the INTA Annual Meeting this week, recommending IP owners take a strategic approach to brand protection.

“Our clients often say ‘can you stop that?’ when one of our brands faces criticism online,” said Rebecca Borden of CBS Corporation. “But we have to be careful. If you take a very tough approach you can look heavy handed, it draws attention to the issue, and given that our organization is about freedom of speech we don’t want to contradict ourselves.”

Instead she urged IP owners to rethink the wording of their standard cease and desist letters, and to take a more lenient approach to fans whose enthusiasm for a brand has crossed the line into infringement. “It doesn’t hurt us to say ‘we recognize you’re a fan and we appreciate that’ and then to explain why we need to enforce our rights to ensure that the creators get paid and that we don’t breach any of our other contracts.”

Pinterest’s Anthony Falzone agreed. “It pays to be nice and respectful to people.”

Borden revealed one of the more unusual requests that she has had to consider while working for the broadcasting company, which airs episodes of Star Trek. CBS was asked whether images from Star Trek could be used on the gravestone of a fan of the sci-fi show. Lawyers had to weigh up whether giving the go-ahead would interfere with a licensing deal the company has with a coffin maker who produces Star-Trek themed caskets, but ultimately sanctioned the request.

In another session on social media in China on Monday, Stanislas Barro of Kerring, which owns brands including PUMA, GUCCI and BRIONI, outlined some of the practical challenges involved in enforcing IP rights online in a country with 618 million internet users, 91% of whom have at least one social media account. He explained how many sellers of counterfeits advertise their products on Sina Weibo to receive maximum exposure, but shift their negotiations with buyers to WeChat, where their conversations remain private. “We get cut out of the discussions at that point,” he said.

“There is lots of ground to cover, the Internet is moving fast and it is a challenge to keep up,” he concluded. On the positive side, however, brand owners are doing more to share best practices for dealing with the problem, and there have been encouraging signs from the authorities, including the establishment of specialized cybercrime units, he said.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article