Being smart about global brand development

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Being smart about global brand development

In an increasingly globalized marketplace, companies need to learn to pick their battles and conserve their resources. That’s the message from yesterday’s panel, The Essentials of Managing a Worldwide Trademark Portfolio Companies.

Companies often instinctively feel the need to secure the maximum level of protection for all of their brands. However, Denise Yee of Visa International says that brand development requires a nuanced approach.

“At Visa, it seems like every client wants to name everything, all the time. And sometimes it makes sense, but a lot of times, for a particular service, it may not need a special name,” Yee explains.

Instead, she says that when discussing with partner companies about a new service, the first question is whether it needs a name at all. Several factors need to be considered, such as the product’s expected shelf life and whether there is will be significant marketing behind it. Other considerations include how many countries the product will be deployed in, whether the targeted audience is aimed at general consumers or other financial institutions.

Daniel Zohny of the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) also stresses the need for a considered approach to brand protection. FIFA has its brands divided into several types, including the FIFA brand itself and the trophy.

There are also the event-related brands, such as logos, slogans and mascots for specific tournaments such as the 2014 FIFA World Cup. In this category, the size of the tournament also helps to determine the brand protection strategy. For example, while marks associated with the World Cup will be registered in many jurisdictions, for a smaller event such as an under-17 tournament, the brand protection will be focused on perhaps just on the host country.

Thomas Zutic of DLA Piper gave the outside counsel’s perspective. He says one of his main objectives to obtain strong protection for his client’s core trademarks.

“Many times, there will be tons of sub-brands, so you really got to make sure that you understand what is the core brand, what are the core marks and make sure that you are putting the appropriate resources behind that and not for something that’s just a one-time thing for three months,” he says.

In the end, building a brand is about careful weighing of a mark’s value. Even the Visa brand, judged by some to be the ninth most valuable in the world, does not indiscriminately register for the sake of getting a mark.

“We put a lot of thought into what we file, if we file at all.” Yee explains.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Lavoix provide an overview of the UPC’s approach to inventive step and whether the forum is promoting its own approach rather than following the EPO
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
The court ordering a complainant to rank its arguments in order of potential success and a win for Edwards Lifesciences were among the top developments in recent weeks
Frederick Lee has rejoined Boies Schiller Flexner, bolstering the firm’s capabilities across AI, media, and entertainment
Nirav Desai and Sasha S Rao at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox explore how companies’ efforts to manage tariffs by altering corporate structures can undermine their ability to assert their patents and recover damages
Monika Żuraw, founder of Żuraw & Partners, discusses why IP should be part of the foundation of a business, and taking on projects that others walk away from
Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Gift this article