Plain pack opponents make their case in TRIPs

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Plain pack opponents make their case in TRIPs

Opponents of plain packaging have gone at the offensive at the WTO, urging countries considering tobacco plain packaging laws to wait until a decision has been taken in a dispute relating to Australia’s rules

At a meeting of the TRIPs Council in Geneva last week, the five counties that have filed complaints against Australia’s ground-breaking plain packaging laws – Ukraine, Honduras, Dominican Republic, Cuba and Indonesia, supported by Zimbabwe and Nicaragua – claimed that the law has not cut smoking levels in the country.

Ukraine said that Australia’s measure had not worked and was unlikely to work, and referred to the bill now before New Zealand’s parliament as well as reported plans for similar rules in Ireland, the UK, France and Finland. Support for plain packaging during the meeting came from New Zealand, Norway, Canada, Uruguay, the WHO and the EU.

Although the five complainants have urged other countries to delay their own plain packaging plans until the case against Australia is concluded, that is likely to take longer than originally envisaged.

Last month the chairperson of the panel set up to consider all five cases announced that the panel was now unlikely to issue its final report to the parties before the first half of 2016. It had originally been expected before the end of this year. Australia had earlier complained about delays in setting up the panel.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Partner Rob Jacob unveils plans to offer a beginning-to-end trademark service, how to make prosecution profitable, and why IP ‘buy-in’ from the CEO stands the firm in good stead
Sponsored by CAS
CAS provides practical pointers on how intellectual property and R&D teams can work in tandem to unlock tangible benefits and avoid wasted spend
Sponsored by CAS
CAS explores how AI is transforming intellectual property, from inventorship and copyright disputes to new demands on patent attorneys
Sponsored by That.Legal
Gillian Tan of That.Legal discusses a recent decision by the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore and what it reveals about the evidential burden in bad-faith trademark claims
Attorneys at Di Blasi, Parente & Associados share how the protection of trade secrets strengthens innovation by bringing together legal practice, regulatory developments, and established international references
Jin Ooi, who joins as a partner today, said he is excited to offer a ‘rounded’ IP service as the firm deepens its litigation expertise in the UK and Europe
As generics celebrate, practitioners believe innovator companies should brace for an ‘uphill battle’ when trying to prove induced infringement
A team from Cooley shares how they overturned a massive damages award by emphasising that the opposing company’s trade secrets claims were time-barred
Sponsored by Licks Attorneys
Eduardo Hallak, Rafaella Oliveira, and Laís Souza of Licks Attorneys explain how the provision operates in practice, highlighting evidential hurdles and best practices for patent applicants
Sponsored by Liu, Shen & Associates
Chunyu Cui and Ziqing Wu of Liu, Shen & Associates say recent trends in China’s intellectual property courts indicate alignment with international standards and send a clear signal to the global market
Gift this article