Plain pack opponents make their case in TRIPs

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Plain pack opponents make their case in TRIPs

Opponents of plain packaging have gone at the offensive at the WTO, urging countries considering tobacco plain packaging laws to wait until a decision has been taken in a dispute relating to Australia’s rules

At a meeting of the TRIPs Council in Geneva last week, the five counties that have filed complaints against Australia’s ground-breaking plain packaging laws – Ukraine, Honduras, Dominican Republic, Cuba and Indonesia, supported by Zimbabwe and Nicaragua – claimed that the law has not cut smoking levels in the country.

Ukraine said that Australia’s measure had not worked and was unlikely to work, and referred to the bill now before New Zealand’s parliament as well as reported plans for similar rules in Ireland, the UK, France and Finland. Support for plain packaging during the meeting came from New Zealand, Norway, Canada, Uruguay, the WHO and the EU.

Although the five complainants have urged other countries to delay their own plain packaging plans until the case against Australia is concluded, that is likely to take longer than originally envisaged.

Last month the chairperson of the panel set up to consider all five cases announced that the panel was now unlikely to issue its final report to the parties before the first half of 2016. It had originally been expected before the end of this year. Australia had earlier complained about delays in setting up the panel.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Sheppard has added quantum and robotics expertise to its AI industry team to help clients navigate questions around inventorship and IP infringement
The 2026 Americas ceremony recognised outstanding firms and practitioners, along with highlighting impact cases of the year
A development concerning Stephen Thaler’s AI copyright application in India and an integration between IPH group firms were also among the top talking points
As concerns around the little-known litigation tool increase, practitioners say they are educating their clients on how it can be most effective
Kilburn & Strode and Mewburn Ellis are just two firms that have invested heavily in office space – a sign that the legal industry is serious about in-person working
In major recent developments, Dyson snagged another win against Hong Kong-based competitor Dreame and a new AI-powered UPC platform was launched
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Anita Cade, head of Ashurst’s IP and media team in Australia, discusses why law firms that can pull together capability across different practice areas and jurisdictions stand to gain
INTA’s CEO says London-based firms have registered fewer delegates compared to past meetings in San Diego and Atlanta, and questions the 'ethics' of trying to participate without registering
Lobbies and interest groups are among the interveners in a major dispute over whether courts can set patent pool rates
Gift this article