In-house counsel on the need for more patent reform

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

In-house counsel on the need for more patent reform

In-house lawyers disagreed last week about the need for more reform of patent laws to tackle litigation from so-called patent trolls

Mary Huser

Speaking at the International Women’s Leadership Forum in San Jose last week, Mary Huser, general counsel, BlackBerry Technology Solutions (pictured, right of picture with Alexis Garcha), claimed there was a fatigue within the legal profession caused by having to deal with high numbers of lawsuits filed by non-practising entities.

“Last year was a watershed for the explosion of NPE activity. Maybe there was some nugget in some cases but most were completely frivolous,” she said.

Huser said that the America Invents Act (AIA) had provided operating companies with more tools to fight back, including new rules on fighting patent validity before the PTAB.

“Many NPEs are public companies that need to present quarterly reports just like any other company. The threat of a two-to-three-year delay is a real threat. The AIA presents a practical tool. If we can show prior art, the potential level of damages exposure and so on, and lay it out at the start, if we tell them we will go to the PTO and litigate for a few years – then that presents a nice little leverage for settling early.”

The downside of such an approach, said Huser, is the risk that the plaintiff will file amended claims: a risk that must be assessed strategically.

But while she welcomed the impact of parts of the AIA, she argued that courts must be more proactive in tackling frivolous litigation.

“I have encouraged judges to develop local rules to deal with the administration of cases. There has to be a real motion to dismiss stage. That would ensure that non-meritorious cases would not go forward.”

But Alexis Garcha, senior IP litigation counsel at Nokia, told the audience that there are important reasons for protecting innovation.

While she acknowledged that some people now no longer regard Nokia as an operating company, after it sold its handset business to Microsoft last year, she said that the company still has valuable intellectual property.

“I am wary of too much patent reform, Garcha said. “Patent aggregators actually have a value. Frivolous patent suits are an abuse but we don’t want to prevent everyone from enforcing their patents.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
In Iconix v Dream Pairs, the Supreme Court said the Court of Appeal was wrong to interfere with an earlier ruling, prompting questions about the appeal court’s remit
Chris Moore at HGF reflects on the ‘spirit of collegiality’ that led to an important ruling in G1/24, a case concerning how European patent claims should be interpreted
Gift this article