IP police offer advertisers list of infringing websites

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

IP police offer advertisers list of infringing websites

The IP crime unit within the City of London Police has created a list of copyright-infringing websites it wants online advertisers to avoid

It has launched the Infringing Website List (IWL) following a three-month pilot involvingmusic industry groups IFPI and BPI, the Federation Against Copyright Theft, the Publishers Association, and online advertising industry groups ISBA, IPA and IAB UK.

The initiative is designed to attack the revenue sources of the businesses behind infringing sites.

Andy Fyfe, head of the Police IP Crime Unit, said: “If an advert from an established brand appears on an infringing website not only does it lend the site a look of legitimacy, but inadvertently the brand and advertiser are funding online crime. Therefore the IWL also serves as a safety tool, ensuring the reputation of advertisers and brands are not discredited through association with illegal websites.”

The Unit says that the list of websites is an online portal of sites identified by the creative industries and verified by the police that can be used by advertisers and agencies when they are deciding where to place their adverts.

The IWL was today the subject of a freedom of information request, with the police asked to reveal which websites have so far been removed from the List, as result of, for example, compliance with copyright laws.

The European Commission is trying to encourage brand owners and advertisers to develop a similar EU-wide list. In an interview with Managing IP, Kerstin Jorna, head of the IP team within DG Internal Market, said she wanted her officials to tackle the business models used by copyright infringers.

“In 2014 we want to follow the money,” she said.

But not all brand owners have been quick to support the Commission’s plans for an MOU to create what would effectively be a blacklist of IP-infringing sites. The Commission says that while some gave it a positive reaction at the November meeting, others had either questioned the importance of the problem for them in particular or had been unaware of the problem.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers at Lavoix provide an overview of the UPC’s approach to inventive step and whether the forum is promoting its own approach rather than following the EPO
Andrew Blattman, who helped IPH gain significant ground in Asia and Canada, will leave in the second half of 2026
The court ordering a complainant to rank its arguments in order of potential success and a win for Edwards Lifesciences were among the top developments in recent weeks
Frederick Lee has rejoined Boies Schiller Flexner, bolstering the firm’s capabilities across AI, media, and entertainment
Nirav Desai and Sasha S Rao at Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox explore how companies’ efforts to manage tariffs by altering corporate structures can undermine their ability to assert their patents and recover damages
Monika Żuraw, founder of Żuraw & Partners, discusses why IP should be part of the foundation of a business, and taking on projects that others walk away from
Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Gift this article