Canada proposes new trade mark legislation

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Canada proposes new trade mark legislation

Christian Paradis

Canada’s Minister of Industry, Christian Paradis, has introduced legislation that would crack down on counterfeits, redefine the term trade mark and allow for so-called divisional trade mark applications, among other changes

Christian Paradis

Bill C-56 had its first reading in the House of Commons on Friday. Among the most significant changes it proposes is a new definition of a trade mark that would recognise non-traditional marks, including colour, smell, taste and texture marks, as well as confirm the registrability of sound and hologram marks, according to Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh.

Specifically, the legislation defines the word trade mark as "a sign or combination of signs that is used by a person for the purpose of distinguishing or so as to distinguish their goods or services from those of others". It is this introduction of a so-called sign concept that would allow for the registration of non-traditional marks.

The present language of the Trade-Marks Act defines a trade mark as "a mark that is used by a person for the purpose of distinguishing or so as to distinguish wares or services manufactured, sold, leased, hired or performed by him from those manufactured, sold, leased, hired or performed by others".

"The totality of changes is clearly meant to create flexibility and allow for the registration of all types of non-traditional marks but only if they are, in fact, distinctive," wrote Kelly Gill of Gowlings.

The bill would also improve border measures by granting Customs officials authority to seize and detain goods and establishing criminal provisions for infringement, with fines of up to $1 million, imprisonment up to five years, or both.

Additionally, the bill would allow for filing of certification marks based on proposed use, rather than having to wait until the mark is already in use, as applicants do now.

Divisional trade mark applications would also be permitted, allowing applicants to register for goods and services already in use without having to abandon the application for the remaining goods and services.

The bill is expected to move quickly to a second reading and then be referred to a committee where witnesses may be called to comment and amendments will be considered.

"Since the Bill was introduced by the Government, which has a majority in both Parliament and the Senate, it is expected that the Bill will pass during the current session of Parliament," said Smart & Biggar's release.

The Bill must then undergo a similar process in the Senate before receiving Royal Assent and implementation.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The UK-India trade deal doesn’t mention legal services, showing India has again failed to agree on a move that could help foreign firms and local practitioners
Eva-Maria Strobel reveals some of the firm’s IP achievements and its approach to client relationships
Lateral hires at Thompson Hine and Pierson Ferdinand said they were inspired by fresh business opportunities and innovative strategies at their new firms
The launch of a new IP insurance product and INTA hiring a former USPTO commissioner were also among the top talking points this week
The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
Gift this article