First fine handed out under New Zealand’s three strikes law

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

First fine handed out under New Zealand’s three strikes law

The first fine has been issued under New Zealand’s three strikes anti-illegal downloading regime, according to a report in Stuff.co.nz

The unnamed user, who received a fine of NZ $616 ($500), had illegally downloaded Rihanna’s “Man Down” and Hot Chelle Rae’s “Tonight Tonight” for her third strike.

The system, part of the Copyright (Infringing File Sharing) Amendment Act, came into effect on September 1 2011. Detection notices are issued for the first and second instances to inform the user that he/she is downloading infringing material. If the user downloads infringing material a third time, an enforcement notice is issued.

Each instance of infringement must be more than 28 days apart. If the user downloads infringing material less than 28 days after a notice is issued, the subsequent action is recorded but there will be no additional notice.

After three notices, the copyright owner may file a complaint to the Copyright Tribunal. The rights owner may seek a fine of up to NZ$15,000 ($12,500). The Act also gives courts discretion to terminate the user’s internet account for up to six months.

Some rights holders have complained about the cost to issue a notice, set at NZ$25 ($20) plus taxes. A spokesperson for the Recording Industry Association of New Zealand (RIANZ) told Stuff.co.nz that it had issued about 6,000 notices since the law came into effect.

Some provisions have not yet come into effect. The three strikes system does not cover mobile internet usage at this time, though it is set to do so on October 1 2013.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

News of the EUIPO launching a GI protection system, and WIPO publishing a review of the UDRP were also among the top talking points
A team from Addleshaw Goddard secured victory for the changing robe brand, following a trial against competitor D-Robe
Bird & Bird, Brinkhof and Bardehle Pagenberg were successful at the Court of Appeal, while there was a partial victory for Amazon in a case concerning audio recordings
Following the anniversary of Venner Shipley and AA Thornton's merger, Ian Gill recalls the initial trepidation about working for his spouse and offers tips for those who may find their personal and professional worlds colliding
Two partners have departed DLA Piper to join Squire Patton Boggs and Blank Rome in San Francisco and Chicago, respectively
Practitioners say a 32% rise in court fees is somewhat expected to maintain the UPC’s strong start, but some warn that SME clients could be squeezed out
Swati Sharma and Revanta Mathur at Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas explain how they overcame IP office objections to secure victory for a tyre manufacturer
Claudiu Feraru, founder of Feraru IP, discusses the benefits of a varied IP practice and why junior practitioners should learn from every case
In the ninth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP & ME, a community focused on ethnic minority IP professionals
Firms that made strategic PTAB hires say that insider expertise is becoming more valuable in the wake of USPTO changes
Gift this article