EU Court says yes to Anheuser-Busch’s Bud CTM

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

EU Court says yes to Anheuser-Busch’s Bud CTM

Businesses that want to oppose Community trade marks have been given more guidance from the CJEU’s General Court as to how it will apply the rules on the use of a sign “in the course of trade of more than mere local significance”

In the latest round of a long-running legal battle between rival brewers Anheuser-Busch and Budějovický Budvar,the Court ruled yesterday that the Czech company could not prevent the registration of the Community trade mark Bud for beer.

Budějovický Budvar had opposed Anheuser-Busch’s application to OHIM, citing the existence of the appellation of origin “bud”, as protected in France, Italy and Portugal under the Lisbon Agreement and in Austria under bilateral deals between Austria and the former Czechoslovak Socialist Republic.

OHIM dismissed Budějovický Budvar’s oppositions on the grounds that its evidence of the use of the appellation of origin “bud” in Austria, France, Italy and Portugal was insufficient.

OHIM’s decision was ultimately appealed to the Court of Justice, which held that a geographical indication protected in a member state can only prevent the registration of a CTM if it was actually used in a sufficiently significant manner in the course of trade in a substantial part of the territory of that state.

The General Court was asked to consider whether that criterion had been met in this case.

On January 22 the Court ruled that it had not.

In particular, it said that the Czech company had not shown OHIM evidence of the use of the term bud in the course of trade of more than mere local significance before the US company filed its CTM application in July 1996.

Budějovický Budvar produced invoices showing deliveries using the term bud to just three towns in France. As such, the Court said it had not satisfied the “more than mere local significance” test. Its sales of beer using the bud name were similarly low in Austria.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
The IP boutique is betting that growing investment in quantum and semiconductors will fuel demand as technology shifts toward physical systems
Lawyers say the overhaul better reflects commercial reality, with changes spanning novelty searches, digital designs and access to a small claims track, but stopping short of criminalising unregistered design infringement
Carpmaels & Ransford hires its fourth partner of the year and wins access to UPC files, as fresh orders address costs, confidentiality and the use of divisional patents
Gift this article