EU IP offices clarify Nice Class Heading questions

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

EU IP offices clarify Nice Class Heading questions

Applicants for trade marks in Europe have been given new guidance about how they use general indications of the Nice Class headings in their applications

The guidance, contained in an updated version of OHIM’s Manual on Trade Mark Practice, follows a decision by the Court of Justice of the EU in IP Translator.

In June last year the Court ruled that trade mark applicants in Europe must identify goods and services “with sufficient clarity and precision” so that examiners and other businesses can determine the extent of protection “on that basis alone”.

Since then, EU IP offices, Switzerland’s IPI, Norway’s NIPO, user associations and OHIM have been working on a common position on the interpretation of the Nice Class headings and the acceptability of general indications of the Nice Class headings.

Now they have agreed a second Common Communication setting out a list of 11 general indications which lack clarity and precision, requiring further specification. These include Class 6 (Goods of common metal not included in other classes) and Class 7 (Machines and machine tools).

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Vice presidents Shinya Jitsuhiro and Hirohisa Suzuki discuss litigation trends in Japan, recruitment challenges and clients’ international expansion
IP boutique Petillion represented IKEA in the dispute, which concerned the use of the multinational’s trademarks in an immigration-focused campaign. The firm tells Managing IP how it secured the outcome
The Pizzeys-Griffith Hack integration was designed to create a stronger Australian IP platform but with several ex-Pizzeys principals now gone, the deal's success may depend on where clients place their trust
Thomas Lonsdale and Hsu Min Chung of HGF explore the practical impact of the EPO’s Enlarged Board of Appeal’s decision in G1/25 and its interplay with G1/24
The firm’s recent IP hire and launch of a new robotics industry group signal an effort to capture work emerging from AI entering the physical world
Another firm sets up shop in Dallas, bringing its patent disputes capabilities to one of the US’s busiest litigation venues
Entrepreneurial IP lawyers are still launching specialist firms, but increasingly with larger teams, broader coverage and greater infrastructure than the boutique model once implied
Jevon Louis explains how Covid led to a focus on local clients, discusses why mediation is successful in Singapore and reflects on the growing demand for AI advice
An increase in instructions from domestic companies and litigation for international clients are driving success for the Chinese IP firm, according to two lead partners
Ankur Sangal said he wants his team, nearly 30-strong already, to respond to a growing demand for specialist, commercially focused IP advice in a ‘rapidly evolving’ Indian market
Gift this article