EU IP offices clarify Nice Class Heading questions

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

EU IP offices clarify Nice Class Heading questions

Applicants for trade marks in Europe have been given new guidance about how they use general indications of the Nice Class headings in their applications

The guidance, contained in an updated version of OHIM’s Manual on Trade Mark Practice, follows a decision by the Court of Justice of the EU in IP Translator.

In June last year the Court ruled that trade mark applicants in Europe must identify goods and services “with sufficient clarity and precision” so that examiners and other businesses can determine the extent of protection “on that basis alone”.

Since then, EU IP offices, Switzerland’s IPI, Norway’s NIPO, user associations and OHIM have been working on a common position on the interpretation of the Nice Class headings and the acceptability of general indications of the Nice Class headings.

Now they have agreed a second Common Communication setting out a list of 11 general indications which lack clarity and precision, requiring further specification. These include Class 6 (Goods of common metal not included in other classes) and Class 7 (Machines and machine tools).

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

By accepting a relatively small sample of infringing content to grant worldwide relief, a UK court has adopted a pragmatic approach that could reduce the time and expense involved in huge enforcement actions
This year’s IP STARS Americas rankings reveal that firms are expanding their capabilities, particularly in trade secrets and life sciences
Law firms’ expanding IP capabilities are driving broader industry recognition across a wider range of practice areas
As specialist boutiques challenge traditional firm models, major disputes involving Disney, Ericsson, Siemens and Dolby highlight the firms winning work before the UPC
The firm has added two leading damages specialists as it expands beyond technical analysis and deepens its role in the economics of IP litigation
Josh Seidenfeld, partner at DLA Piper, outlines the emerging legal trends that drive the future of life sciences innovation and how stakeholders can prepare for the future
South Korea's One Law Partners is combining with boutique firm Minwho Law Group to leverage global expansion of K-content and build a broader offering spanning IP, tech and regulatory advisory work
Russell Kennedy's Gina Tresidder on juggling matters, delivering hard truths, and why IP ownership is rarely as simple as people think
Attorney Oran Friar and trainee attorney Harry Cunliffe at Reddie & Grose, share that patent filings for clinical LLMs are surging, but success in the UK and Europe hinges on demonstrating technical innovation
Implementers can use the UK courts to seek FRAND terms for patent pool licences
Gift this article