UK extends copyright protection

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK extends copyright protection

The UK has implemented a 2011 European directive extending copyright protection for sound recordings from 50 years to 70 years after the recording is made

Cliff Richard

The changes are brought in by the Copyright and Duration of Rights in Performances Regulations 2013, implementing EU Directive 2011/77/EU. The Regulations were made on July 17, laid before Parliament on July 18 and come into force today (November 1).

The Regulations also harmonise the length of copyright term for co-written works. The copyright will expire 70 years after the death of the last surviving author.

Additional measures introduced include:

  • A session fund, which will pay session musicians 20% of revenues from sales of their recordings;

  • A so-called clean slate provision, under which a producer may not make deductions from payment to performers; and

  • A use-it or lose-it clause, allowing performers and musicians to claim back their performance rights if they are not being commercially exploited.

The Directive was agreed following lobbying from European performers, many of whose rights were set to expire under the 50-year rule. Some people dubbed it the Cliff Richard law, after the performer (right).

It was controversial, as several studies (such as the Gowers Review) had recommended not changing the copyright term, and some member states – notably Belgium and Sweden – opposed it.

In a statement, Minister for IP Lord Younger said: “These changes demonstrate the Government`s ongoing commitment to, and support for, our creative industries - who are worth billions to our economy.”

Jo Dipple, chief executive of UK Music, said: “We are pleased that the Government is implementing changes that acknowledge the importance of copyright to performers and record companies. This change will mean creators can rightfully continue to make a living from their intellectual property and works.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brazilian in-house counsel say law firms’ technology investments have not translated into tangible benefits, meaning tech use is a minor factor when selecting advisers
A lack of comfort among some salaried partners shows why law firms must actively foster inclusion, not merely focus on diversity mandates
Arrival of Laura Alonso, alongside a team of 11, will bring ‘significant value’ to ECIJA clients, says CEO
In the first of a two-part article, lawyers at Spruson & Ferguson and Marshall Gerstein provide an overview of China’s system for appealing against patent invalidation decisions
Lawyers and corporate leaders at INTA’s Business of M&A conference in New York discussed how cross-practice collaboration and early in-house involvement can help deals
Lily Li, partner at Morrison Foerster, shares how her litigation team helped secure victory at the ITC in a patent infringement case
Top talking points also included news of an appellate ruling concerning ‘Pisco’ and Indian drugmakers gearing up to launch generic versions of Ozempic as Novo Nordisk’s patent expires
The government’s keenly awaited view on AI and copyright has positive themes but leaves rights owners wanting, says Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard
While IP Australia’s updated manual could be favourable to computer-implemented inventions, stakeholders would like to see whether a consistent and reliable standard is followed during actual examination
UKIPO will remain a competitive option as long as efficient service continues
Gift this article