Concerns raised over litigation speed in Brazil

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Concerns raised over litigation speed in Brazil

We had a topical webinar on IP litigation in Brazil this week, with some great presentations and insightful contributions from the audience, via interactive polling

There was one very clear finding from the polls: speed is considered the most challenging aspect of IP litigation in the country.

brazil-football-wallpaper-250.jpg

On the ball: could Brazil's footballers teach their courts some lessons about pace and timing?

69% of those who voted agreed, while just 19% said consistency of judgments was the number one issue, and just 13% said cost. None at all chose quality of judgments (the other option available).

Judging from the discussion between the panellists that followed, it seems that speed of trials is a particularly big problem in Brazil because of the concentration of litigation in the Rio de Janeiro courts and the possibility of multiple (vexatious) appeals and staying actions.

This is not a new complaint. In a roundtable discussion we published last month, UK IP attaché Sheila Alves said that the slow pace of litigation in Brazil was among the top complaints she hears, along with the lack of specialized judges (and it may be, of course, that those two issues are connected).

It should be said of course that you would probably get similar complaints about speed regarding IP litigation throughout Latin America and indeed in many other jurisdictions, including the EPO and parts of the United States.

But this is something the Brazilian authorities should not ignore. Lawyers report increasing interest from overseas investors in the country, and a growing number of disputes coming before the courts. With the country hosting the football World Cup next year, and the Olympics taking place in Rio in 2016, action needs to be considered now to ensure that justice is not delayed.

Listen to the recorded webinar on IP litigation in Brazil on managingip.com.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Value-added services give in-house counsel the satisfaction that they are getting more value for money, while law firms get the opportunity to win more work
A team at Boies Schiller Flexner is advising shoe company Kizik and parent company HandsFree Labs in the dispute
Nokia’s latest enforcement actions against Geely and Transsion joining Via LA’s AAC pool were also among the top talking points
Benjamin Kelly, the firm’s fifth IP partner hire in a little over one year, has experience in patent and trade secret disputes involving complex technologies
Half-year Talent Tracker data shows Pierson Ferdinand was among the most prolific hirers in the US, while in Europe, there has been a notable UPC swing
Exclusive data reveals in-house counsel want external legal advisers to build better client relationships and add value beyond routine work
Brett Sandford acted for Perplexity AI, which fended off the threat of a preliminary injunction to launch an AI-powered web browser
Stephen Yang joins us for our ‘Five minutes with’ series to explain why his role requires him to wear many hats
The complaint follows a declaratory ruling issued by the England and Wales High Court last month that said Samsung is entitled to an interim licence
Tobias Hahn explains how the firm's multi-jurisdictional setup enabled it to secure an injunction on behalf of Fujifilm relating to defendant Kodak’s non-UPC activity
Gift this article