Trade groups urge US Congress to expand CBM review

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Trade groups urge US Congress to expand CBM review

A group of trade associations wrote to US Congress yesterday urging politicians to expand a review of business method patents to help them fight patent trolls

The 26 organisations, which included retail groups, marketing associations and public interest advocates such as the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said the system is being exploited by patent trolls who impose “huge costs” that “drain funds from job creation." They claimed that in 2011 alone, patent assertion entities (PAEs) cost American businesses at least $29 billion.

The authors claim that defending a patent lawsuit typically a small or medium business $1.75 million and the average cost of patent litigation is $6 million. They claim that 7,000 businesses were sued by PAEs in 2011-2012 and that the number of companies sued by patent assertion entities has increased by 28% a year of average since 2004.

“Because proving a PAE’s patent invalid through litigation can take years and cost millions, a targeted company faces a no-win situation: it can pay lawyers, the PAE, or both,” they said.

The groups want Congress to expand Covered Business Method (CBM) review, which is limited at present to financial services patents, to other industries. Under CBM review, a procedure for challenging business method patents, a party being sued for patent infringement can ask the USPTO to invalidate a patent. The USPTO can consider whether a patent is abstract, vague, or too broad during CBM, but these grounds for invalidation are not available under other procedures conducted through the USPTO.

Attempting to get a patent invalidated under CBM costs around $100,000, including around $30,000 in USPTO fees, compared to multimillion-dollar litigation. Several businesses targeted by one patent owner would also be able to split the fees and costs for the procedure.

Expanding CBM review to cover all types of patents has previously been proposed by several pieces of legislation, including the Innovation Act, introduced earlier this month, and the Stopping the Offensive Use of Patents (STOP) Act, introduced in July.




more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A settlement between Philips and Transsion and a loss for AstraZeneca in the UK were also among the top talking points
Working with Harvey and Microsoft, the firm has been at the forefront of developing AI tools for its lawyers, and is now exploring new projects and business models
The Emotional Perception AI case, which centres on the patentability of an artificial neural network, will be heard next week
Developments included a court order related to InterDigital’s anti-anti-suit injunction against Disney, and clarification on recoverable costs
Partners at Foley Hoag examine how recent CJEU jurisprudence may serve as a catalyst for recalibrating US judicial reluctance to entertain foreign patent claims
International law firms have high hopes for their IP practices in Saudi Arabia, with many opening offices, but recruiting and retaining talent in the Kingdom presents unique challenges
Patrick Ogola joins us for our ‘Five minutes with’ series to discuss helping African entrepreneurs on the global stage, and explains why young lawyers should speak up
Heli Pihlajamaa, the EPO’s principal director for patent law and procedures, joins us to take stock of the unitary patent following its second anniversary
Kelly Thompson, chair of South African firm Adams & Adams, discusses self-belief, self-doubt, and the importance of saying yes
The renowned food brands were represented by a host of lawyers, including members of the firms’ IP teams
Gift this article