Goodlatte launches US Innovation Act

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Goodlatte launches US Innovation Act

The Innovation Act, introduced this week by House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte, represents an attempt to deal with litigation issues that were left out of 2011’s America Invents Act (AIA), USPTO Director of Governmental Affairs, Dana Colarulli said yesterday

Speaking to the AIPLA's Q Todd Dickinson during the opening plenary (below), Colarulli noted that many of the issues that were not included in the AIA remained of interest to many members of Congress. “That’s what this current bill tries to address,” he said, adding that “a broader audience” is now shaping the patent debate, including app developers and the retail industry.

screen20shot202013-10-2520at2010.png

Chairman Goodlatte’s bill, which comes after two discussion drafts were circulated earlier this year, seeks to tackle abusive patent litigation. It is the latest of several Congressional initiatives to address the issue, and may have the highest likelihood of being enacted.

The bill has bipartisan support, with 10 co-sponsors. Announcing it on Wednesday, Goodlatte said: “The bipartisan Innovation Act is designed to eliminate the abuses of our patent system, discourage frivolous patent litigation and keep US patent laws up to date. These important actions will help fuel the engine of American innovation and creativity, creating new jobs and growing our economy.”

Among other things, the bill would: 

  • require patentees to disclose more details at initial pleading; 

  • make fee shifting easier; 

  • increase transparency by requiring parties to reveal information on who has an interest in patents; 

  • limit discovery until after a claim construction ruling; and

  • provide for easier stays in customer suits. 

It also makes a number of changes to the AIA, including to the CBM review procedure – though does not go as far on this issue as some members of Congress would like.

A House Judiciary Committee hearing on the bill will take place on Tuesday and a bill in the Senate is also expected soon.

Colarulli said the legislation addresses four out of the seven legislative recommendations made by the White House in June this year and is “narrowly focused on cost concerns”. He added that the changes aim to promote consistency in the courts and increase transparency, including through better information on ownership at the USPTO and in courts.

Asked to predict what would happen, Colarulli said: “I think it will pass. The question is timing.” He added that the bipartisan support for patent litigation reform is key: “It’s one of the few issues where [bipartisan action] can happen in Congress."

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Kelly Thompson, chair of South African firm Adams & Adams, discusses self-belief, self-doubt, and the importance of saying yes
The renowned food brands were represented by a host of lawyers, including members of the firms’ IP teams
Partners at Bird & Bird and Taylor Wessing discuss how Saudi Arabia offers unique opportunities for firms dealing in IP and tech
Attorneys explain why there are early signs that the US Supreme Court could rule in favour of ISP Cox in a copyright dispute
A swathe of UPC-related hires suggests firms are taking the forum seriously, as questions over the transitional stage begin
A win for Nintendo in China and King & Spalding hiring a prominent patent litigator were also among the top talking points
Rebecca Newman at Addleshaw Goddard, who live-reported on the seminal dispute, unpicks the trials and tribulations of the case and considers its impact
Attorneys predict how Lululemon’s trade dress and design patent suit against Costco could play out
Lawyers at Linklaters analyse some of the key UPC trends so far, and look ahead to life beyond the transition period
David Rodrigues, who previously worked at an IP boutique, said he may become more involved in transactional work at his new firm
Gift this article