UK drops plans for superfast patents

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

UK drops plans for superfast patents

The UK government has ditched plans to allow IP owners to pay for a 90-day patent processing service following a consultation with IP Office users

The Office published its consultation paper in April, asking users whether they would be willing to pay for an expedited service. Although some were in favour, others raised concerns that it could lead to the granting of invalid patents; that it would place a heavier burden on third parties to monitor applications and respond more quickly; and that early publication could prove a commercial disadvantage to applicants. Nor were respondents convinced of the benefits of paying a fee estimated at between £3,500 and £4,000 ($5,500 - $6,250) for a superfast service when the IPO already operates accelerated search and examination services.

The IPO received 22 responses from patent attorney groups, IP professionals and businesses. Now the government says that there appears to be insufficient demand for a new superfast service.

The plan for superfast patent grants was announced by UK Business Secretary Vince Cable in December as part of a series of measures the government was proposing to boost creativity and innovation. One week later the government revealed controversial proposals to widen the exceptions in the country’s copyright laws.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The tie-up could result in the firm’s German and France-based teams, which both have strong UPC expertise, becoming independent
News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Gift this article