Roche abandons Herceptin patent fight in India

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Roche abandons Herceptin patent fight in India

Swiss pharmaceutical company Roche has ended its attempt to secure patent protection for breast cancer drug Herceptin in India

The company said in a statement emailed to Managing IP that it has decided not to pursue Indian patent 205534 (the secondary patent covering trastuzumab, marketed as Herceptin) and its related divisional applications.

“This decision takes into account the strength of the particular rights and the IP environment in India in general,” said a spokesman for the company.

Roche’s move comes just months after the IP Appellate Board of the country’s IP office upheld a compulsory licence issued to domestic generics company Natco over a Bayer drug, Nexavar. The Committee on Price Negotiation for Patented Drugs later issued a report recommending India issue more such licences.

Last month, however, the Times of India reported that the Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion had refused to issue a compulsory licence for trastuzumab.

Roche’s spokesman added: “While Roche may not have patent protection for Trastuzumab in India, it is important to note that there are currently no approved biosimilars of Trastuzumab in India. We support the Indian Government’s leadership in establishing a pathway and guidelines for the introduction of biosimilars onto the market that is based on science and is designed to ensure product quality and patient safety.”

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article