US transport organisation files lawsuit against “frivolous” patent claims

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

US transport organisation files lawsuit against “frivolous” patent claims

The American Public Transport Agency has filed a lawsuit in an effort to halt “frivolous” patent infringement claims against its members by companies based in Luxembourg and the British Virgin Islands.

The complaint, filed last week, seeks to halt “frivolous” claims against public transportation agencies by ArrivalStar and Melvino Technologies for providing transit information to customers.

According to the complaint, every case that ArrivalStar has filed against public transport agencies has been settled within months of filing, “because ArrivalStar’s intent is merely to extract a harassment payment” from agencies that will be “disproportionately burdened” by litigation.

APTA is requesting a jury trial and is asking the court to invalidate the patents. The case is American Public Transport Agency v ArrivalStar and Melvino Technologies.

“Public transportation plays a critical function in American society,” said APTA in its complaint. “In the midst of a struggling economy for governments and citizens alike, where budgets are tight for everyone, the last thing public transportation agencies should be forced to do is pay unjustified license fees to patent holders making frivolous infringement claims.”

The suit follows several recent steps by the Obama administration and government agencies to curb the activities of patent trolls. Last month, the White House announced a series of legislative priorities and executive actions, the FTC said it would be investigating potentially anti-competitive practices of trolls and the ITC launched a pilot programme aimed at preventing trolls from gaining import bans based on frivolous claims.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Peter Ling of Lenz & Staehelin in Zurich discusses trends in patent litigation, the regulation of AI and the benefits of teaching IP
Brandsmiths and Powell Gilbert will contest claims over several UK trademarks in a High Court case examining the ownership and revival of a heritage brand
Hogan Lovells Cadwalader is taking a fresh strategic approach to pricing in its AI strategy. It could amplify calls for law firms to ditch the billable hour
Charles Harding plans to build a new team around life sciences oppositions and contentious work, drawing on his three decades developing a practice from scratch at D Young & Co
The firm reveals how its litigation strategies informed the arguments that took Masimo’s judgment past $818 million
The firm was rebuilding its IP practice through a string of patent hires and a Texas expansion, but its dissolution has put the newly built talent back into the market
AI can exploit longstanding gaps in copyright protection at remarkable speed, but EU law still provides tools to fight back, says Simon Hembt at Bird & Bird
The firm has tapped a local patent trio to establish a foothold in the market and broaden its national presence
New Asia-Pacific IP head Jonathan Chu is eyeing opportunities arising from Chinese technology licensing, overseas enforcement and increasingly IP-heavy cross-border deals
Europe’s largest intellectual property convention and trade fair is back: IP Service World 2026 takes place in Munich from November 23–25 – the 16th edition, with 1,400-plus attendees from 55-plus nations, 100-plus speakers, and 100-plus exhibitors. Three days. Two focused areas. One IP marketplace.
Gift this article