ITC launches pilot programme aimed at curbing patent trolls

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

ITC launches pilot programme aimed at curbing patent trolls

The US International Trade Commission (ITC) announced on Monday that it has launched a pilot programme to speed up the disposal of patent cases in an effort to thwart so-called trolls

The programme will test whether earlier rulings on certain issues in Section 337 investigations, which deal with allegedly unfair import practices usually in relation to intellectual property, could reduce frivolous litigation.

The main remedy available in Section 337 investigations is an order requiring US Customs to preventing the infringing imports from entering the country.

Under the scheme, an administrative judge will determine whether companies suing for patent infringement have sufficient production, research or licensing operations in the US to make them eligible to be heard at the ITC. In some cases, the judges may be able to determine whether the plaintiff meets the criteria within 100 days.

The ITC may adjust the programme once it is underway. If the trial is successful, the system may be implemented permanently.

In a press release, the ITC admitted that “resolving issues in pilot program investigations will be challenging” but argued that “the complainant controls the timing of the complaint’s filing and should be prepared to prove its case, including such elements as domestic industry, importation, and standing, without extensive discovery on these issues".

The ITC initiative appears to be part of a coordinated effort by government agencies to address the growing issue of patent trolls. Earlier this month the White House issued a proposal to combat trolls, which will largely be put into action by the USPTO, and the Federal Trade Commission announced it will investigate their potentially anti-competitive practices.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Six hires across the IP spectrum reflect Orrick’s efforts to better serve tech clients across the IP lifecycle
David Stone, partner at White & Case, argues that the government’s planned reforms will modernise and futureproof UK design law, but leave two of the thorniest problems unresolved
Max Scott will join the firm’s IP transactions group in California, becoming the latest Weil IP partner to secure their future
Yonatan Drori, attorney at Drori-Stav IP in Israel, explains why foreign counsel must treat Israel’s patent disclosure requirements as an ongoing obligation, rather than a one-off formality
From Japan to Southeast Asia, domestic and regional firms picked up some of the biggest prizes, while key foreign players maintained momentum
Earlier this month, Managing IP had exclusively reported that the French arm of Taylor Wessing was minded to pull out of the deal
Our latest podcast examines how Weil’s IP practice evolved, where its practitioners could (and will) go next, and which firms and markets stand to benefit from the redistribution of talent
Former Latham partner Chris Henry and transactions lawyer Liza Cotter are heading to the firm as Weil’s IP practice starts to disperse
Rival IP teams return to court for a closely watched appeal over AI and copyright, but observers hoping for answers to some of the technology’s biggest legal questions may be left disappointed
Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Gift this article