Politicians urge Obama to allow public review of IP provisions in TPP

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Politicians urge Obama to allow public review of IP provisions in TPP

Six members of US Congress have written to US President Barack Obama expressing concern that "secret" negotiations over intellectual property in the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) Agreement benefit pharmaceutical companies at the expense of public health.

The six Democrats - Jan Schakowsky (Illonois), Michael Michaud (Maine), Rosa DeLauro (Conneticut), George Miller (California), Barbara Lee (California) and Peter Welch (Vermont) - said the current proposals would have "profound and long-lasting consequences".

In the letter, sent yesterday, the Members urged Obama not to make any final trade agreements "that affect critical health issues" until members of the public and Congress have had the opportunity to review the provisions and provide input.

In particular, they argued that proposed provisions relating to data exclusivity, patent registration and procedure and enforcement would "delay generic competition and increase the price of medicine" and lead to "preventable illnesses and deaths".

"Certainly, trade negotiations conducted behind closed doors are not the place to make changes that would have such profound consequences for patents and veterans, as well as state and federal budgets," they wrote.

Although the TPP negotiations were meant to have been conducted in secret, whistleblowing website WikiLeaks has released several documents which suggest the US is exerting "great pressure" on other nations to adopt stricter IP policies. In the latest release, yesterday, WikiLeaks published two leaked documents that suggest that the US is isolated in its positions on many IP policies.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

As concerns around the little-known litigation tool increase, practitioners say they are educating their clients on how it can be most effective
Kilburn & Strode and Mewburn Ellis are just two firms that have invested heavily in office space – a sign that the legal industry is serious about in-person working
In major recent developments, Dyson snagged another win against Hong Kong-based competitor Dreame and a new AI-powered UPC platform was launched
Mohit and Sidhant Goel decided not to pursue an interim injunction application so that their client, Communications Components Antenna, could benefit from a fast-track trial
Anita Cade, head of Ashurst’s IP and media team in Australia, discusses why law firms that can pull together capability across different practice areas and jurisdictions stand to gain
INTA’s CEO says London-based firms have registered fewer delegates compared to past meetings in San Diego and Atlanta, and questions the 'ethics' of trying to participate without registering
Lobbies and interest groups are among the interveners in a major dispute over whether courts can set patent pool rates
Benoit Geurts and Coreena Brinck will help the firm ‘accelerate its innovation agenda’, according to its managing partner
News of a trademark row over Taylor Swift’s ‘The Life of a Showgirl’ and Nokia’s expansion of its IoT licensing programme were also among the top talking points
IP attorneys share how the Cox v Sony ruling impacts their counselling strategies, and if the case could influence how courts may assess liability for AI platforms
Gift this article