Australian IP statistics - influenced by China's National IP Strategy?

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Australian IP statistics - influenced by China's National IP Strategy?

Data published by IP Australia shows increasing activity from China and the Asia-Pacific region

Australia received 1,856 innovation patent applications in 2012, a 9% increase over 2011. Filings from China alone accounted for more than half of the increase.

By contrast, there were 26,358 invention patent applications in 2012, only a 3% increase over the previous year.

Invention patent filings from China also increased, though they account for just a small portion of total volume. Chinese patentees filed 510 invention patents in Australia last year, a 34% increase. South Korea, well known for its high tech industries, saw a 48% increase with 502 filings. In comparison, filings from European countries including Germany, France and the UK dropped, though overall volume is still considerably higher than either China or Korea. Germany for example, despite seeing a 6% decrease, still had 1,596 applications, enough for third most among foreign countries behind the US (11,378), and Japan (1,746).

The report is silent on the cause behind the increase in Chinese filings. Some critics of China’s IP policies have suggested that monetary incentives for domestic and international filings encourage low quality patents. Utility models, which are similar to innovation patents, drew particular attention. One lawyer explained that China’s incentives for PCT filings turn on filing rather than actually getting a patent, so some companies will file a PCT application, only to abandon it before reaching the national phase.

IP Australia’s data also shows that Australian companies are active overseas. Data for 2011 shows that Australian companies file 58% more patents in international markets when compared to domestic filings.

China’s importance as a growing market is reflected here. In 2012, it became the most popular location for Australian trade mark filings abroad with 2,571 applications. After China, Australian companies filed the most trade marks in New Zealand (2,215) and the US (2,015).

The Australia Intellectual Property Report 2013 can be found here.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Erise IP has added a seven-practitioner trademark team from Hovey Williams, signalling its intention to help clients at all stages of development
News of prison sentences for ex-Samsung executives for trade secrets violation and an opposition filed by Taylor Swift were also among the top talking points
A multijurisdictional claim filed by InterDigital and a new spin-off firm in Germany were also among the top talking points
Duarte Lima, MD of Spruson & Ferguson’s Asia practice, says practitioners must adapt to process changes within IP systems, as well as be mindful of the implications of tech on their practices
Practitioners say the UK Supreme Court’s decision could boost the attractiveness of the UK for AI companies
New awards, including US ‘Firm of the Year’ and Latin America ‘Firm to Watch’, are among more than 90 prizes that will recognise firms and practitioners
DWF helped client Dairy UK secure a major victory at the UK Supreme Court
Hepworth Browne led Emotional Perception AI to victory at the UK Supreme Court, which rejected a previous appellate decision that said an AI network was not patentable
James Hill, general counsel at Norwich City FC, reveals how he balances fan engagement with brand enforcement, and when he calls on IP firms for advice
In the second of a two-part article, Gabrielle Faure-André and Stéphanie Garçon at Santarelli unpick EPO, UPC and French case law to assess the importance of clinical development timelines in inventive step analyses
Gift this article