Patent fight over knitted trainers could set trend in sportswear

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Patent fight over knitted trainers could set trend in sportswear

Yesterday an injunction against adidas over trainers that use a knitted upper was lifted in Germany. The dispute, brought by Nike, could start a series of patent cases in the sportswear industry

The Nike European patent concerns a shoe with a meltable polymer material used in its knitted upper. The technology is used in the Nike Flyknit shoe, melting the knitted yarn together to add reinforcement to the knitted construction, which makes it seamless and very light.

Adidas adizero primeknit upper

The adiZero Primeknit shoe, which was the subject of the suit, was launched later but had been in production for three years, according to adidas. Pictured is the one-piece upper of the shoe.

The Nuremberg district court lifted an ex parte injunction won by Nike on September 24. Adidas had succeeded in stopping the enforcement of the injunction on October 10.

The case is unusual because sportswear companies are rarely involved in patent suits, despite often owning hundreds of patents over their products.

"That is changing now, as the market becomes more driven by technologies such as this, rather than straight design," comments a lawyer close to the case. "Sportswear increasingly uses advanced materials, chemical compounds and technology built into the products."

It is likened to the automobile industry in Germany, which is rarely the subject of patent cases. Most disputes are settled, end in cross-licensing or "the infringement is merely tolerated",says the lawyer.

Bardehle Pagenberg is representing adidas in the case and Wragge & Co and Prinz & Partner are representing Nike.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Plasseraud IP says it is eyeing AI and quantum computing expertise with new hire from Cabinet Netter
In the fifth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss the ‘Careers in Ideas’ network and how to open access to the profession
McGuireWoods’ focussed experimentation and disciplined execution of AI tools is sharpening its IP practice
As Marshall Gerstein celebrates its 70-year anniversary, Jeffrey Sharp, managing partner, reflects on lessons that shaped both his career and the firm’s success
News of two pharma deals involving Novo Nordisk and GSK and a loss for Open AI were also among the top talking points
Howard Hogan, IP partner at Gibson Dunn, says AI deepfakes are driving lawyers to rethink how IP protects creativity and innovation
Gift this article