Patent fight over knitted trainers could set trend in sportswear

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Patent fight over knitted trainers could set trend in sportswear

Yesterday an injunction against adidas over trainers that use a knitted upper was lifted in Germany. The dispute, brought by Nike, could start a series of patent cases in the sportswear industry

The Nike European patent concerns a shoe with a meltable polymer material used in its knitted upper. The technology is used in the Nike Flyknit shoe, melting the knitted yarn together to add reinforcement to the knitted construction, which makes it seamless and very light.

Adidas adizero primeknit upper

The adiZero Primeknit shoe, which was the subject of the suit, was launched later but had been in production for three years, according to adidas. Pictured is the one-piece upper of the shoe.

The Nuremberg district court lifted an ex parte injunction won by Nike on September 24. Adidas had succeeded in stopping the enforcement of the injunction on October 10.

The case is unusual because sportswear companies are rarely involved in patent suits, despite often owning hundreds of patents over their products.

"That is changing now, as the market becomes more driven by technologies such as this, rather than straight design," comments a lawyer close to the case. "Sportswear increasingly uses advanced materials, chemical compounds and technology built into the products."

It is likened to the automobile industry in Germany, which is rarely the subject of patent cases. Most disputes are settled, end in cross-licensing or "the infringement is merely tolerated",says the lawyer.

Bardehle Pagenberg is representing adidas in the case and Wragge & Co and Prinz & Partner are representing Nike.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

A $110 million US verdict against Apple and an appellate order staying a $39 million trademark infringement finding against Amazon were also among the top talking points
Attorneys are watching how AI affects trademark registrations and whether a SCOTUS ruling from last year will have broader free speech implications
Patent lawyers explain why they will be keeping an eye on the implications of a pharma case and on changes at the USPTO in the second half of 2025
The insensitive reaction to a UK politician crying on TV proves we have a long way to go before we can say we are tackling workplace wellbeing
Adrian Percer says he was impressed by the firm’s work on billion-dollar cases as well as its culture
In our latest interview with women IP leaders, Catherine Bonner at Murgitroyd discusses technology, training, and teaching
Developments included an update in the VAR dispute between Ballinno and UEFA, the latest CMS updates, and a swathe of market moves
The LMG Life Sciences Americas Awards is thrilled to present the 2025 shortlist
A new order has brought the total security awarded to a Canadian tech company to $45 million, the highest-ever by an Indian court in an IP case
Andrew Blattman reflects on how IP practices have changed and shares his hopes for increased AI use and better performance on the stock market
Gift this article