AIPPI to appear before UK Supreme Court

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

AIPPI to appear before UK Supreme Court

AIPPI’s UK Group has intervened in a prominent case pending before the UK Supreme Court, AIPPI deputy reporter general Nicola Dagg told the Executive Committee this week

The case, R v Special Commissioners of Income Tax ex p Prudential, will determine whether advice from non-lawyers can benefit from legal professional privilege.

The hearing is on 6 November 2012, with a judgment expected early next year. AIPPI UK’s intervention focuses on protecting the already-existing statutory privilege that covers the work of patent and trade mark attorneys. In the UK, as in many other jurisdictions, patent and trade mark attorneys are a distinct profession from lawyers (solicitors and barristers) and are governed by different laws.

AIPPI UK’s intervention is believed to be the first from a non-profit body since the Supreme Court took over from the House of Lords in 2009. The Court consists of 12 judges and cases are normally beard by panels of three or five.

AIPPI UK is represented, pro bono, by the law firm Gowlings and barrister Michael Edenborough QC.

Client-attorney privilege is the subject of AIPPI Question 199, which considered the topic of privilege for patent and trade mark attorneys as well as other groups. The special committee recommended finding bilateral or multilateral solutions and made a number of submissions to WIPO.


Download the AIPPI Congress News, published by Managing IP from Seoul, Korea, from our conference newspapers page.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The UK-India trade deal doesn’t mention legal services, showing India has again failed to agree on a move that could help foreign firms and local practitioners
Eva-Maria Strobel reveals some of the firm’s IP achievements and its approach to client relationships
Lateral hires at Thompson Hine and Pierson Ferdinand said they were inspired by fresh business opportunities and innovative strategies at their new firms
The launch of a new IP insurance product and INTA hiring a former USPTO commissioner were also among the top talking points this week
The firm explains how it secured a $170.6 million verdict against the government in a patent dispute surrounding airport technology, and why the case led to interest from other inventors
Developments of note included the court partially allowing a claim concerning confidentiality clubs and a decision involving technology used in football matches
The firm said adding capability in the French capital completes its coverage of all major patent litigation jurisdictions as it strives for UPC excellence
Marc Fenster explains how keeping the jury focused on the most relevant facts helped secure a $279m win for his client against Samsung
Clients are divided on what externally funded IP firms bring to the table, so those firms must prove why the benefits outweigh the downsides
Rahul Bhartiya, AI coordinator at the EUIPO, discusses the office’s strategy, collaboration with other IP offices, and getting rid of routine tasks
Gift this article