India clarifies pharma trade mark rules

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

India clarifies pharma trade mark rules

India has published a list of names that cannot be registered as trade marks for pharmaceutical products that should provide greater protection to drugs makers

Last week it released a list of international nonproprietary names (INNs) as declared by the World Health Organisation. It runs to more than 120 pages.

Indian law firm Khaitan & Co says that section 13 of the 1999 Trade Marks Act prevents the IP Office from registering commonly used and accepted names of any single chemical element/compound of a chemical substance or preparation, INNs or words deceptively similar to INNs as trade marks.

If the Registrar of Trade Marks has already registered any INNs, then they are liable to be cancelled.

The IP Office is now expected to tell examiners to examine pharmaceutical trade marks for any similarities to the list of non-proprietary names.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article