How a revised trade mark law in Europe might look

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

How a revised trade mark law in Europe might look

European Commission officials might be behind schedule when it comes to publishing their proposals to update the EU’s trade mark rules, but a group of academics has produced an at-a-glance guide to how they believe the law should be changed

Three years ago the Commission asked the Max Planck Institute to study how the EU trade mark functions. The Institute’s report was published early last year. The Commission was expected to issue its proposals to update the Trade marks Directive and CTM Regulation in October 2011, but that timetable has now slipped.

Commission official Kerstin Jorna said earlier this year that her team was spending time on the drafting stage of the process to ensure that the final proposals are adopted quickly. But Managing IP understands that part of the delay may be due to events overtaking the drafting process. One example is the so-called IP Translator issue. The Commission’s proposals were expected to resolve questions about the way IP offices in Europe treat class headings in trade mark applications, but OHIM has since led efforts by national offices to harmonise their approaches.

Now the Max Planck Institute has published its own synopses of the Trade Mark Directive and the CTM Regulation, setting out the law and how it should be changed, clause by clause.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Sim & San, which secured the $16m victory for their client, previously led Communications Components Antenna to a $26m damages win in 2024
IP litigator Ruth Hoy has led the London office since 2022
Emotional Perception AI is seeking more than £200,000 after the UK Supreme Court backed its appeal
Lawyers at Pinsent Masons discuss why the advent of ‘AI-free’ might be a crucial moment for brands seeking to protect their identity
Newly independent King & Wood has established offices in North America, while Mallesons has entered a ‘new era’ with a 1,200-lawyer firm across Australia and Singapore
Ryan Dykal and John Wittenzellner of Boies Schiller Flexner tell Managing IP what’s driving the firm’s patent litigation expansion
News of Dolby suing Snap over AV1 and HEVC patents and SCOTUS offering guidance on the liability of internet service providers were also among the top talking points
Arrival of Caitlin Heard will bolster the soon-to-be-created Ashurst Perkins Coie’s IP presence in the capital
AI, cybersecurity and data practice group will provide clients with legal guidance around AI alongside a 'deep technical foundation’ in IP
Lawyers at Vondst and Biopatents say a ruling concerning the protected status of trade secrets could see the UPC flooded with requests to prevent access to confidential information
Gift this article