How a revised trade mark law in Europe might look

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

How a revised trade mark law in Europe might look

European Commission officials might be behind schedule when it comes to publishing their proposals to update the EU’s trade mark rules, but a group of academics has produced an at-a-glance guide to how they believe the law should be changed

Three years ago the Commission asked the Max Planck Institute to study how the EU trade mark functions. The Institute’s report was published early last year. The Commission was expected to issue its proposals to update the Trade marks Directive and CTM Regulation in October 2011, but that timetable has now slipped.

Commission official Kerstin Jorna said earlier this year that her team was spending time on the drafting stage of the process to ensure that the final proposals are adopted quickly. But Managing IP understands that part of the delay may be due to events overtaking the drafting process. One example is the so-called IP Translator issue. The Commission’s proposals were expected to resolve questions about the way IP offices in Europe treat class headings in trade mark applications, but OHIM has since led efforts by national offices to harmonise their approaches.

Now the Max Planck Institute has published its own synopses of the Trade Mark Directive and the CTM Regulation, setting out the law and how it should be changed, clause by clause.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The tie-up could result in the firm’s German and France-based teams, which both have strong UPC expertise, becoming independent
News of a slowdown in the UK’s clean energy IP landscape and an EPO report on unitary patent uptake were also among the top talking points
Price hikes at ‘big law’ firms are pushing some clients toward boutiques that offer predictable fees, specialised expertise, and a model built around prioritising IP
The Australian side, in particular, can benefit by capitalising on its independent status to bring in more work from Western countries while still working with its former Chinese partner
Koen Bijvank of Brinkhof and Johannes Heselberger of Bardehle Pagenberg discuss the Amgen v Sanofi case and why it will be cited frequently
View the official winners of the 2025 Social Impact EMEA Awards
King & Wood Mallesons will break into two entities, 14 years after a merger between a Chinese and an Australian firm created the combined outfit
Teams from Shakespeare Martineau and DWF will take centre stage in a dispute concerning the registrability of dairy terminology in plant-based products
Senem Kayahan, attorney and founder at PatentSe, discusses how she divides prosecution tasks, and reveals the importance of empathetic client advice
The association’s Australian group has filed a formal complaint against the choice of venue, citing Dubai as an unsafe environment for the LGBTQIA+ community
Gift this article