A guide to asserting your green credentials

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

A guide to asserting your green credentials

Companies that want to make claims about the environmental attributes of their products now have a new guide to getting it right from the FTC, the US competition and consumer watchdog

The Federal Trade Commission has issued revised versions of its so-called green guides to help marketing specialists avoid making spurious claims about their companies’ products.

“The introduction of environmentally friendly products into the marketplace is a win for consumers who want to purchase greener products and producers who want to sell them,” said FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz. “But this win-win can only occur if marketers’ claims are truthful and substantiated.”

The rising number of companies making claims about the environmentally-friendly claims of their products has made it a hot topic for marketing specialists and for the IP lawyers who advise them. Two years ago INTA hosted a session on green marketing at its Annual Meeting.

But companies that adopt this marketing tactic run the risk of being accused of greenwashing if they cannot substantiate their statements.

To avoid that charge, the updated guides caution marketers not to make broad, unqualified claims that a product is “environmentally friendly” or “eco-friendly”. That’s because a consumer perception study carried out for the FTC reveals that these kinds of claims are likely to suggest that the product has specific and far-reaching environmental benefits.

They also contain a new section on certifications and seals of approval. These set out how marketers could disclose a so-called material connection that might affect the weight or credibility of an endorsement. The FTC also discourages the use of environmental certifications or seals that don’t clearly convey the basis for the certification, because such seals or certifications are likely to convey general environmental benefits.

Although the Green Guides are not agency rules or regulations, they describe the types of environmental claims the FTC might find deceptive, which could ultimately lead to a Commission ban on the advertising.

Managing IP has published an IP clinic on using certification marks offered by certifying organisations. You can read advice from the Soil Association, the CEO of a fair trade coffee company and a lawyer who advises businesses who want to certify their products.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Erise IP has added a seven-practitioner trademark team from Hovey Williams, signalling its intention to help clients at all stages of development
News of prison sentences for ex-Samsung executives for trade secrets violation and an opposition filed by Taylor Swift were also among the top talking points
A multijurisdictional claim filed by InterDigital and a new spin-off firm in Germany were also among the top talking points
Duarte Lima, MD of Spruson & Ferguson’s Asia practice, says practitioners must adapt to process changes within IP systems, as well as be mindful of the implications of tech on their practices
Practitioners say the UK Supreme Court’s decision could boost the attractiveness of the UK for AI companies
New awards, including US ‘Firm of the Year’ and Latin America ‘Firm to Watch’, are among more than 90 prizes that will recognise firms and practitioners
DWF helped client Dairy UK secure a major victory at the UK Supreme Court
Hepworth Browne led Emotional Perception AI to victory at the UK Supreme Court, which rejected a previous appellate decision that said an AI network was not patentable
James Hill, general counsel at Norwich City FC, reveals how he balances fan engagement with brand enforcement, and when he calls on IP firms for advice
In the second of a two-part article, Gabrielle Faure-André and Stéphanie Garçon at Santarelli unpick EPO, UPC and French case law to assess the importance of clinical development timelines in inventive step analyses
Gift this article