Facebook feels users’ wrath over Instagram terms of service

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Facebook feels users’ wrath over Instagram terms of service

Facebook’s fleeting decision to change Instagram’s terms of service yesterday highlights the fine line in social media between sound business policies and PR nightmares

“Legally, the scope of the rights that a company has in user and/or user-generated content depends on the grant of rights provisions in its Terms of Service,” said Michael Kasdan of Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein. This means that companies must spell out clearly what their rights are for users in order to guarantee maximum monetisation of the site’s content.

Under Facebook’s proposed model for Instagram yesterday, a third-party company could pay Facebook for images it may want to use, but Facebook is under no obligation to compensate the user, said Kasdan. “Notably, there is no opt-out provision; the choice for a user is either to use Instagram and give up these rights, or to use another service,” he added.

Instagram competitors like Flickr mobile have taken a different approach, requiring the express permission of the user before sharing photos with third parties, and sharing compensation with the user. 

Angry users, including Mark Zuckerberg’s wedding photographer, immediately voiced their concerns on Instagram yesterday.

“Ultimately, the market will decide” if this is a sound business decision for Facebook, said Kasdan following the announcement. “What we are seeing right now is a very strong and negative reaction among the user-base.”

Today, Instagram responded to the market’s concerns by backtracking on the changes, promising to “fix any mistakes, and eliminate the confusion”.

Kevin Systrom, co-founder of Instagram, continued in his blog post: “As we review your feedback and stories in the press, we’re going to modify specific parts of the terms to make it more clear what will happen with your photos.”

Systrom also said the site will remove the language about using users’ photos in ads.“We do not have plans for anything like this and because of that we’re going to remove the language that raised the question,” he wrote. 

"The market has spoken," said Kasdan. "And [Facebook is] listening."

For more tips on writing effective Terms of Service provisions, see Kasdan's and Charles Macedo's July article on the topic for Managing IP.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Speaking to Managing IP at Via’s Bridge Summit in San Francisco, president Kevin Mack explains why the AI infrastructure boom is forcing a rethink of traditional SEP licensing and FRAND models
Law firms continue to sell clients on international footprints, but sprawling office networks count for little if financial structures discourage internal collaboration
Via's Qi pool expands its footprint in Asia with the addition of Chinese smartphone giant and Japanese auto company
Matthew Cassie becomes the tenth partner to join the firm’s London outpost, and the second since it opened its new headquarters in May this year
A&O Shearman and Fish & Richardson invested in German talent, meanwhile, major firms have assembled for an on the merits case pitting KeeeX against OpenAI and Adobe
Julia Bishop is director of IP at Twilio in the US
Hellberg is an IP director at Essity in Sweden
Teemu Itälä is head of legal and compliance for technology standards at Nokia in Finland
Palińska is the business & IP law lead at CD Projekt Red in Poland
Schwitulla is the head of litigation management at Nokia in Germany
Gift this article