Facebook feels users’ wrath over Instagram terms of service

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Facebook feels users’ wrath over Instagram terms of service

Facebook’s fleeting decision to change Instagram’s terms of service yesterday highlights the fine line in social media between sound business policies and PR nightmares

“Legally, the scope of the rights that a company has in user and/or user-generated content depends on the grant of rights provisions in its Terms of Service,” said Michael Kasdan of Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein. This means that companies must spell out clearly what their rights are for users in order to guarantee maximum monetisation of the site’s content.

Under Facebook’s proposed model for Instagram yesterday, a third-party company could pay Facebook for images it may want to use, but Facebook is under no obligation to compensate the user, said Kasdan. “Notably, there is no opt-out provision; the choice for a user is either to use Instagram and give up these rights, or to use another service,” he added.

Instagram competitors like Flickr mobile have taken a different approach, requiring the express permission of the user before sharing photos with third parties, and sharing compensation with the user. 

Angry users, including Mark Zuckerberg’s wedding photographer, immediately voiced their concerns on Instagram yesterday.

“Ultimately, the market will decide” if this is a sound business decision for Facebook, said Kasdan following the announcement. “What we are seeing right now is a very strong and negative reaction among the user-base.”

Today, Instagram responded to the market’s concerns by backtracking on the changes, promising to “fix any mistakes, and eliminate the confusion”.

Kevin Systrom, co-founder of Instagram, continued in his blog post: “As we review your feedback and stories in the press, we’re going to modify specific parts of the terms to make it more clear what will happen with your photos.”

Systrom also said the site will remove the language about using users’ photos in ads.“We do not have plans for anything like this and because of that we’re going to remove the language that raised the question,” he wrote. 

"The market has spoken," said Kasdan. "And [Facebook is] listening."

For more tips on writing effective Terms of Service provisions, see Kasdan's and Charles Macedo's July article on the topic for Managing IP.



more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Qantm IP’s CEO and AI programme lead discuss the business’s investment and M&A plans, and reveal their tech ambitions
Controversial plans were scrapped by the Commission earlier this year after the Parliament had previously backed them
Lawyers at Spoor & Fisher provide an overview of how South Africa is navigating copyright and consent requirements to improve access to works for blind and visually impaired people
Gillian Tan explains how she balances TM portfolio management with fast-moving deals, and why ‘CCP’ is a good acronym to live by
In the eighth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Ability, a network for disabled people and carers active in the IP profession
The longest government shutdown in US history froze ITC operations, yet IP practices stayed steady as firms relied on early preparation and client communication
Licensing chief Patrik Hammarén also reveals that the company will rename its IPR business to better reflect its role in defining standards
The acquisition of Pecher & Partners follows the firm’s earlier expansion into litigation to create a ‘one-stop shop’
News of Via Licensing Alliance launching its first semiconductor patent pool and INTA electing a new president were also among the top talking points
Submit your nominations to this year's WIBL Americas Awards by January 23
Gift this article