AIPPI report recommends overhaul

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

AIPPI report recommends overhaul

A frank report commissioned by the industry association says AIPPI has “stalled” and needs urgent reform if it is to remain relevant

The report by Robin Rolfe Resources (RRR) tells AIPPI its organisation is too “large and bulky”, that it needs to hire more permanent staff, and that it will only maintain its status if it becomes more of a lobbying body – pushing for the IP harmonisation its resolutions recommend.

AIPPI commissioned the report last year and it was released on the association’s website on Monday. It is not easy to find, however, illustrating some of the criticism of the site contained in the report.

The report, which was based on several surveys by RRR as well as telephone interviews and comparative studies, is described by incoming AIPPI President John Bochnovic as “direct and dramatic, given what we are used to in this organisation”.

John Bochnovic AIPPI

John Bochnovic

But he said it reflects a “real appetite for change”. “It gives us a great platform to make decisions at the Congress in Seoul next month. Given the report and its emphasis on urgency and boldness, we will have failed if we can’t agree something there,” said Bochnovic, who is due to be elected president during the Seoul Congress.

Some of the changes can be implemented “almost immediately”, such as changes to the presentation of information. Others, such as reforming management, may take amendment to the statutes. That could theoretically waiting until the next Congress, in Toronto in 2014.

“There are ways to work around that, though they’re not easy,” said Bochnovic. “I want to get this going much faster than that though – and some things could be voted on remotely even before the Forum at Helsinki in 2013.”

Among the Report’s recommendations are that:

- AIPPI must become more influential and exhibit leadership. It must try to make its ideas on harmonisation a reality - The national groups have too much control. AIPPI must become centralised - The management structure is “unnecessarily complicated” with two “essentially identical decision-making bodies”. The executive committee, council of presidents and bureau must be given separate roles - The association needs more permanent staff - Joint ventures with academia and industry-specific committees should be established to help fill holes with those two groups - Advertising and other sources of revenue should be considered - Communications need to be more editorial and reports edited by a native English speaker - More than four questions must be addressed at every Congress - The Congress meetings should be annual and planning for them should be taken away from the group in the host country

Bochnovic says that Rio de Janeiro, which is scheduled to hold a Forum and Executive Committee meeting in 2015, could be transformed into a Congress. He also recognises that destinations such as Cancun – planned for 2018 – can be hard for attendees to justify.

Said Bochnovic: “This is definitely something we needed. We may be ‘too old, too white and too male’, as Robin quotes a respondent saying in her Report, but we are not too old to change.”

The Report will be discussed in detail at the AIPPI Congress in Seoul next month.

Managing IP will be publishing the AIPPI Congress News during the meeting in print and online , with news and reports from Seoul, including an extended interview with Bochnovic.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Brian Paul Gearing brings technical depth, litigation expertise, and experience with Japanese business culture to Pillsbury’s IP practice
News of InterDigital suing Amazon in the US and CMS IndusLaw challenging Indian rules on foreign firms were also among the top talking points
IP lawyers at three firms reflect on how courts across Australia have reacted to AI use in litigation, and explain why they support measured use of the technology
AJ Park’s owner, IPH, announced earlier this week that Steve Mitchell will take the reins of the New Zealand-based firm in January
Chris Adamson and Milli Bouri of Adamson & Partners join us to discuss IP market trends and what law firm and in-house clients are looking for
Noemi Parrotta, chair of the European subcommittee within INTA's International Amicus Committee, explains why the General Court’s decision in the Iceland case could make it impossible to protect country names as trademarks
Inès Garlantezec, who became principal of the firm’s Luxembourg office earlier this year, discusses what's been keeping her busy, including settling a long-running case
In the sixth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss IP Futures, a network for early-career stage IP professionals
Rachel Cohen has reunited with her former colleagues to strengthen Weil’s IP litigation and strategy work
McKool Smith’s Jennifer Truelove explains how a joint effort between her firm and Irell & Manella secured a win for their client against Samsung
Gift this article