Kobe Bryant fights for Chinese trade mark

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Kobe Bryant fights for Chinese trade mark

First it was Michael Jordan. Now Kobe Bryant is the latest American basketball player to go to court over naming rights in China

China’s Ministry of Commerce reports that the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (TRAB) has denied Nike’s opposition to a Chinese individual from Fujian province who registered the name of Los Angeles Lakers star Kobe Bryant. He has registered “KB-Bryant” and the Chinese alliteration for Kobe (科比) in class 18, which covers items such as handbags and wallets.

Kobe_Bryant

The TRAB found that Nike, who has an endorsement deal with Bryant, failed to show that Bryant was well known in fields other than basketball and that the trade marks did not infringe upon Nike’s marks.

Nike has appealed the TRAB’s ruling to the Beijing No. 1 Intermediate People’s Court.

The National Basketball Association is extremely popular in China, and a number of NBA stars have had to fight against unaffiliated Chinese companies using their names.

Yao Ming, the league’s first player from China, had to deal with companies using his name to sell beer and steel pipes. Michael Jordan has filed a lawsuit against Qiaodan Sportswear, which registered the Chinese version of his name, “乔丹” (“Qiaodan”). Recently, Jeremy Lin discovered that the owner of Wuxi Risheng Sporting Goods registered the somewhat cumbersome “Jeremy S.H.L. 林书豪”mark in 2011, nearly a year before Lin’s sudden rise to fame.





more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Firms explain the IP concerns that can arise amid attempts by brands to show off their ‘Canadianness’ to consumers
Counsel say they will be monitoring issues such as the placement of house marks, and how Mondelēz demonstrates a likelihood of confusion in its dispute with Aldi
The EUIPO expanding its mediation services and a new Riyadh office for Simmons & Simmons were also among the top talking points this week
David Boundy explains why Pierson Ferdinand provides a platform that will allow him to use administrative law to address IP concerns
Developments included an anti-anti-suit injunction being granted for the first time, and the court clarifying that it can adjudicate over alleged infringements that occurred before June 2023
Griffith Hack’s Amanda Stark, one of our ‘Top 250 Women in IP’, explains how peer support from male colleagues is crucial, and reveals why the life sciences sector is thriving
The case, which could offer clarity on the training of AI models within the context of copyright law, will go to trial in the UK next week
CMS IndusLaw co-founder Suneeth Katarki says he plans to hire a patent team in India and argues that IP should play a major role within full-service firms
Partners at the firm explain why they’ve seen more SEP cases at the ITC, and why they are comfortable recommending the forum to clients
The association, which will head to London in 2026, hosted its flagship event in the Californian city in 2005, 2015 and 2025
Gift this article