The subtle art of product placement

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The subtle art of product placement

Following the release of the Steven Spielberg classic E.T. in 1982, sales of REESE’S PIECES candy—the Martian’s favorite treat—increased by 65%

This is one example of product placement done correctly, said speakers on the afternoon panel of yesterday’s In-House Practitioners Workshop.


With the advent of technologies such as TIVO and digital video recorders (DVR), more brands are making deals with TV and movie studios to integrate their products into programming in order to ensure their ads don’t get fast-forwarded. Companies spent $6.25 billion on product placement in 2009, said Judy McCool of Home Box Office, Inc., who moderated yesterday’s panel.


But McCool said that brand integration in the media is “an art form” and must be approached with caution. Brand owners who manage to seamlessly integrate with “emotionally engaging” forms of media could see results like REESE’S PIECES—but there are many risks to consider.


Michael Sirota of Leo Burnett Worldwide said that films or TV shows which include too many product placements can be a turn-off for viewers by making the content seem over-commercialized. In one example, Sirota said that viewers of the James Bond film Die Another Day nicknamed the flick Buy Another Day, thanks to its $70 million in product placements.


Britney Spears also was heavily criticized after the release of her music video for the song “Hold it Against Me,” which included $500,000 worth of product placements for brands including SONY and the dating website, PLENTY OF FISH.


Other risks include the lack of control brand owners have once they agree to product placement deals, particularly in the case of reality TV programming. “There’s an inherent leap of faith that brands take when signing these deals,” said Benjamin Mulcahy of Sheppard Mullin. “It’s really giving the studio broad editorial control over their trademarks.”


Hollywood Producer Anthony Dominici provided his perspective on product placement as Executive Producer of shows such as Extreme Makeover Home Edition and America’s Next Top Model. “It’s a negotiation process,” said Dominici, responding to a question about how he deals with brand owners who ask for too much control over the content of a show. “I try to make the integration process organic,” said Dominici, adding that he often cannot promise brands what they ask.


Yesterday’s In-House Practitioners Workshop also included a panel on best practices for protecting trademarks in Latin America, a lively keynote address by Stanford University Professor Mark Lemley (pictured) and a networking luncheon.

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

AI, cybersecurity and data practice group will provide clients with legal guidance around AI alongside a 'deep technical foundation’ in IP
Lawyers at Vondst and Biopatents say a ruling concerning the protected status of trade secrets could see the UPC flooded with requests to prevent access to confidential information
Sharad Vadehra of Kan & Krishme discusses why older IP firms still have an edge over up-and-coming boutiques and how the firm is using AI to provide quick and cost-effective service
Lawyers at Appleyard Lees share how they picked apart a plant breeder’s infringement claims concerning the ‘Tango’ mandarin
A further decision on long-arm status, and a new hire for Pentarc in Germany from Taylor Wessing were also among top developments
The US decision marks a rare grant of a request under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act in a patent case
Stobbs has applied to strike out a contempt of court application filed against the firm and two of its lawyers
With trademark volumes surging, trademark teams need to think beyond traditional clearance searches, towards a continuous, intelligence-led workflow, says Meghan Medeiros of Corsearch
Brazilian in-house counsel say law firms’ technology investments have not translated into tangible benefits, meaning tech use is a minor factor when selecting advisers
A lack of comfort among some salaried partners shows why law firms must actively foster inclusion, not merely focus on diversity mandates
Gift this article