The Netherlands: Ascertaining inventive step in a dosage of tadalafil

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

The Netherlands: Ascertaining inventive step in a dosage of tadalafil

Cialis® is a pharmaceutical product for the treatment of erectile dysfunction developed by Lilly ICOS, a joint venture of ICOS Corporation and Eli Lilly and Company. The active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) of Cialis®, tadalafil, inhibits the PDE5 enzyme, just like sildenafil in the better-known Viagra®.

Recently, the District Court of The Hague had to decide whether a pharmaceutical unit dosage composition for a maximum daily dosage of 5mg of tadalafil for the treatment of a sexual dysfunction, as claimed in ICOS's patent EP1173181, involves an inventive step. Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe, claiming invalidity of the patent before the court, argued that this dosage composition is obvious in view of an earlier patent publication by ICOS (WO 97/03675).

Contrary to ICOS's submissions, by disclosing the use of tadalafil for sexual dysfunction, this earlier document incentivises the skilled person to develop a second in class drug for this indication and the skilled person would accordingly start clinical trials. As such, the court reasoned that the case comes down to the question of which dosages would be tested in a phase IIb clinical trial and whether 5mg would be part of this trial.

Following this reasoning, the court judged that the skilled person could then walk down two one-way streets, which would both inevitably lead to the dosage unit composition of 5 mg. Going down a first street, the skilled person would find pharmaceutical data in phase I clinical trial studies which would, together with known efficacy data for sildenafil in Viagra®, enable him to make the calculated estimation that a 5mg daily dosage should be included in phase IIb clinical trial tests. The court then further argued that, even if the skilled person would not take this street, but instead would turn into phase IIb clinical trial studies with daily dosages of 25, 50 and 100 mg, the skilled person would have found a constant efficacy of tadalafil at these dosages and would accordingly have lowered the dosage to reduce side effects. As such, either street would lead the skilled person to an effective daily dosage of 5mg with minimal side effects.

Therefore, in the court's decision, all roads obviously lead to Cialis®.

Henri van Kalkeren


V.O.Carnegieplein 5, 2517 KJThe HagueThe NetherlandsTel: +31 70 416 67 11Fax: +31 70 416 67 99info@vo.euwww.vo.eu

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Deborah Kirk discusses why IP and technology have become central pillars in transactions and explains why clients need practically minded lawyers
IP STARS, Managing IP’s accreditation title, reveals its latest rankings for patent work, including which firms are moving up
Leaders at US law firms explain what attorneys can learn from AI cases involving Meta and Anthropic, and why the outcomes could guide litigation strategies
Attorneys reveal the trademark and copyright trends they’ve noticed within the first half of 2025
Senior leaders at TE Connectivity and Clarivate explain how they see the future of innovation
A new action filed by Nokia against Asus and a landmark ruling on counterfeits by South Africa’s Supreme Court were also among the top talking points
Counsel explain how they’re navigating patent prosecution matters and highlight key takeaways from Federal Circuit cases
A partner who joined Fenwick alongside two others explains what drew her to the firm and her hopes for growth in Boston
The England and Wales High Court has granted Kirkland & Ellis client Samsung interim declaratory relief in its ongoing FRAND dispute with ZTE
A UDRP decision that found in favour of a small business in a domain name dispute could encourage more businesses to take a stand in ‘David v Goliath’ cases
Gift this article