Austria: Examining registration of foreign language trade marks

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 4 Bouverie Street, London, EC4Y 8AX

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Austria: Examining registration of foreign language trade marks

Sponsored by

sonn-400px.png

An example of an international trade mark that Austria considered for registration is Access the Inaccessible for goods and services all connected to mountaineering, climbing and work at height. This English language word mark had, among others, a designation for the UK and for Austria. In the UK, the trade mark was finally registered in spite of some difficulties. The Austrian Patent Office and the appellate court did not find it relevant that the mark was approved in the UK. Registration in a foreign country, even in a country where the relevant language is the official language spoken by the whole population, can never be binding for Austria. The reasons behind this are not only formal legal reasons (for example, territoriality), but also that the English authorities examine the trade mark from the viewpoint of English consumers while the Austrian authorities examine the same trade mark from the point of view of Austrian consumers. These perspectives might well be different since the understanding of the meaning of the foreign words might not be identical to that in a foreign country.

Whether a term in a foreign language is distinctive depends on whether it is known in Austria sufficiently so that the circles concerned can understand its meaning in a way that excludes distinctiveness. This can even be the case when the term is unusual in the foreign language. The majority of the Austrian population has a basic knowledge of English. As a result, it cannot be asserted that the words of this trade mark would be considered incomprehensible. On the contrary, people would look for a meaning.

The trade mark owner stressed that the trade mark consists of a contradiction: something which is inaccessible cannot be accessed. The court replied that, in particular, such overstated combinations are widely used in promotional slogans and are therefore not able to form the basis of distinctiveness and therefore to qualify as an indicator of a specific origin of the goods and services. The circles concerned will readily understand the wording of the trade mark in the sense that, with such goods and services, the hitherto inaccessible is now made accessible. To come to that understanding no reflection or varying opinions are needed. Whether the sign could also be understood differently is of no importance. If one form of interpretation is generally complimentary and descriptive, the mark cannot be registered despite other possible interpretations.

Thus English words or a combination of words can be refused as a trade mark by the Austrian authorities, even if accepted as sufficiently distinctive by the authorities in a country where English is an official language.

sonn.jpg

Helmut Sonn

SONN & PARTNER Patentanwälte

Riemergasse 14

A-1010 Vienna, Austria

Tel: +43 1 512 84 05

Fax: +43 1 512 98 05

office@sonn.at

www.sonn.at

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Leaders at the newly merged firm Jones Maxwell Smith & Davis reveal their plan to take on bigger firms while attracting more clients and talent
Charles Achkar, who will bring a team of two with him, said he was excited about joining ‘one of the few strong IP boutiques’
Andy Lee, head of IP at Brandsmiths and winner of the Soft IP Practitioner of the Year award, tells us why 2024 was a seminal year and why clients value brave advice
The deal to acquire MIP's parent company is expected to complete by the end of May 2025
Jinwon Chun discusses the need for vigilance, his love for iced coffee, and preparing for INTA
Karl Barnfather’s new patent practice will focus on protecting and enforcing tech innovations in the electronics, AI, and software industries
Partner Ranjini Acharya explains how her Federal Circuit debut resulted in her convincing the court to rule that machine learning technology was not patent-eligible
Paul Hastings and Smart & Biggar also won multiple awards, while Baker McKenzie picked up a significant prize
Burford Capital study finds that in-house lawyers have become more likely to monetise patents, but that their IP portfolios are still underutilised
Robert Reading and Faidon Zisis at Clarivate unpick some of the data surrounding music-related trademarks
Gift this article