Africa: Genuine use and reputation in South Africa

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Africa: Genuine use and reputation in South Africa

South Africa's Supreme Court of Appeal recently handed down two important judgments. One dealt with genuine use, the other with reputation.

In Westminster Tobacco Co v Philip Morris Products SA (March 16 2017), the issue was whether use made by Westminster (part of BAT) of its registered trade mark Parliament was genuine, and enough to save the registration from attack for non-use. The authorities tell us that use must not be "merely token, serving solely to preserve the rights conferred by the mark". They say that the intention behind the use must be "to maintain or create a share in the market for the goods or services protected by the mark".

The court accepted that BAT did put the mark Parliament in use with a view to protecting the registration. But there was more to it than that – the company was also keen to test a cigarette that would compete with low-cost brands that were eating into BAT's market share. Even though BAT's launch of the low-cost cigarette was not a great success and did not last very long, this did not stop the use from being genuine. These are probably the most important words in the judgment:

Genuineness is to be contrasted with use that is merely token, but the line is a fine one, because the use may be minimal… it may in part be prompted by the fear of removal from the register and be directed at protecting the proprietor's trade generally or preventing the mark from falling into the hands of a competitor.

Herbal Zone v Infitech Technologies (March 10 2017) was a passing off case involving an unregistered mark. In this case an aphrodisiac product that was manufactured by a company in Malaysia was imported into, and sold in, South Africa by a South African company. Who owned the reputation in the mark? The court said that it clearly did not belong to the importer, who had disclaimed rights to the IP in its agreement: "In the face of that disavowal it is difficult to see on what possible basis Infitech could nonetheless acquire the very rights it agreed did not belong to it."

But the court did accept the principle that an importer/ distributor can acquire a reputation in the goods that it sells. But only where it adds something to the mark or get-up "to identify itself as the source of the goods".

Wayne Meiring


Spoor & Fisher JerseyAfrica House, Castle StreetSt Helier, Jersey JE4 9TWChannel IslandsTel: +44 1534 838000Fax: +44 1534 838001

info@spoor.co.ukwww.spoor.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

The four-partner addition includes A&O Shearman’s former co-head of global IP litigation
A settlement involving Disney and another ruling concerning a lawyer’s request for access to documents were also among the big developments
Merchant & Gould's managing partner explains why the firm launched a Boston office and why it brought on board a local boutique
The model covers court-guided settlements, submissions-led determination of infringement and validity issues, and provides leeway for the court to determine a FRAND rate during negotiations
Tie up between Belgium-based firms will create an outfit with almost 30 UPC representatives, and a tier one-ranked patent disputes team
Blank Rome’s launch in West Palm Beach, marked by the arrival of two IP partners, comes in response to rising demands from technology clients
Abion says it has brought on board Matt Serlin as its first US hire to meet client demand for ‘full circle’ trademark and domain name services
News of Health Hoglund joining Sisvel and the Delhi High Court staying a $2.2 million decree in favour of Philips were also among the top talking points
The firm is continuing its aggressive IP hiring streak with the addition of partner Matthew Rizzolo
Pantech counsel Shogo Matsunaga speaks exclusively to Managing IP about how his team proved Google’s unwillingness, and ultimately secured a landmark SEP settlement
Gift this article