Argentina: Full compensation for damage in trade mark infringement

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2025

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Argentina: Full compensation for damage in trade mark infringement

IP rights – among which is the right of the trade mark owner– enable the holder to exploit with exclusivity certain intangible assets. Every time a misappropriation or trade mark infringement takes place, the owner of the trade mark that is subject to infringement also suffers damage, due to the simple fact that a third party is using a similar or identical trade mark without their consent.

In this regard, judges must adopt a broad criterion when applying the remedy of damages, even when it is difficult to prove those damages concretely.

Obtaining full compensation for the damage caused will discourage the violation of any IP rights by infringers. When applying these laws, judges should therefore endeavour to facilitate proper damages to a greater extent in cases of infringement.

Recent decision

In that sense, it is worth mentioning the recent decision of Division I of the Federal Court of Appeals in Civil and Commercial Matters in H I v DITOYS SA on Cease of use of Trade mark of August 16 2016 that provides a good example of such facilitation.

Damages

In relation to the damages suffered, considering that the defendant made inappropriate use of the plaintiff's trade mark, the first instance judge understood that it was very difficult to accurately prove the loss on the basis of the decrease in the plaintiff's income – because this depended on multiple factors. Thus, he argued that the person that acts improperly has to take the risk of the uncertainty generated by their own action, otherwise there would be a thread of impunity around trade mark infringements.

"Once the existence of infringement has been proven, experience, case-law and doctrine affirm that the trade mark owner suffers damage. Undoubtedly, difficulties are encountered when it comes to proving the damage caused in the field of industrial property. Thus, it would be correct to start from presumed damages."

In its decision, the Court confirmed that the remedy of damages is according to law and also sustained the plaintiff's request and increased significantly the amount for damage compensation.

Daniel R Zuccherino

Obligado & Cia

Paraguay 610, 17th Floor

C1057AAH, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Tel: +54 11 4114 1100

Fax: +54 11 4311 5675

admin@obligado.com.ar

www.obligado.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Lawyers say attention will turn to the UK government’s AI consultation after judgment fails to match pre-trial hype
Susan Keston and Rachel Fetches at HGF explain why the CoA’s decision to grant the UPC’s first permanent injunction demonstrates the court’s readiness to diverge from national court judgments
IP, M&A, life sciences and competition partners advised on deal that brings together brands such as ‘Huggies’ and ‘Kleenex’ with ‘Band-Aid’ and ‘Tylenol’
Stability AI, represented by Bird & Bird, is not liable for secondary copyright infringement, though Fieldfisher client Getty succeeds in some trademark claims
Plasseraud IP says it is eyeing AI and quantum computing expertise with new hire from Cabinet Netter
In the fifth episode of a podcast series celebrating the tenth anniversary of IP Inclusive, we discuss the ‘Careers in Ideas’ network and how to open access to the profession
McGuireWoods’ focussed experimentation and disciplined execution of AI tools is sharpening its IP practice
As Marshall Gerstein celebrates its 70-year anniversary, Jeffrey Sharp, managing partner, reflects on lessons that shaped both his career and the firm’s success
News of two pharma deals involving Novo Nordisk and GSK and a loss for Open AI were also among the top talking points
Howard Hogan, IP partner at Gibson Dunn, says AI deepfakes are driving lawyers to rethink how IP protects creativity and innovation
Gift this article