Singapore: MoU signed with India

Managing IP is part of Legal Benchmarking Limited, 1-2 Paris Gardens, London, SE1 8ND

Copyright © Legal Benchmarking Limited and its affiliated companies 2026

Accessibility | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Modern Slavery Statement

Cookies Settings

Singapore: MoU signed with India

October 4 2016 marked a new milestone for the IP arena in Singapore and India, as Singapore's Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong and India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi witnessed the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (IPOS) and the Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion (DIPP) of India. The signing was one of the highlights of the Singapore leader's October visit to New Delhi. This agreement aims to promote creativity, innovation and technological growth in both countries, while expanding bilateral collaboration activities in IP rights, including patents, trade marks and industrial designs.

A Joint Coordination Committee (JCC) will be set up to further the objectives of the MoU. Such objectives include facilitating the exchange of best practices, experiences and knowledge in intellectual property, and organising exchange programmes for IP experts of both countries. The MoU also has objectives to promote events to share and disseminate best practices, experiences and knowledge with members of the IP community, such as academic institutions, enterprises and research and development organisations. In addition, under the MoU, Singapore and India will enhance cooperation in the implementation of modernisation projects for the industrial property arena and foster partnerships to train IP and business communities of both countries.

The MoU will see Singapore and India cooperating to further improve their achievements in innovation and technological advancement. In the Global Innovation Index (GII) 2016 Report (which ranks the world economies' innovation capabilities and achievements) announced on August 15 2016, Singapore climbed to earn the top rank in Asia and was placed sixth globally out of 128 nations. India achieved the fastest growth in patents, boasting 6,153 granted applications in 2014 from 3,377 in 2013. India is also ranked ninth and 14th worldwide in 2014 for trade mark and patent applications respectively.

Internally, Singapore has also been active in efforts to enhance its patent system. Last year, IPOS announced its intention to close the foreign route, which allows patent applicants to rely on the allowance or grant of a corresponding patent application or the International Preliminary Report on Patentability (IPRP) in lieu of local substantive search and examination. A recent update by IPOS confirmed that the closure will take effect from January 1 2020 so as to allow sufficient time for patent applicants to adjust to the change. This change seeks to strengthen the Singapore patent system by ensuring that all Singapore granted patents fully meet Singapore's patentability requirements, thereby enhancing the quality of Singapore granted patents.

In addition, IPOS announced on June 30 2016 stricter guidelines for the assessment of post-grant patent amendments in Singapore. Specifically, post-grant amendments may not now be allowed if the patentee failed to make full disclosure of all relevant matters in relation to the proposed amendments, there was an unreasonable delay on the part of the patentee in seeking the amendments, or the patentee obtained an unfair advantage by delaying the amendments which the patentee knew to be needed.

These assessment criteria are in addition to the requirements under Section 84(3) of the Singapore Patents Act, which stipulates that post-grant amendments to a patent specification are not permitted if the amendments introduce additional matter or extend the scope of protection of the patent. Furthermore, the application for post-grant amendment should set out fully the reason(s) for the amendments, including the circumstances leading to the amendments and any evidence in support thereof.

With continued global, regional and local efforts to enhance the IP landscape of Singapore, the republic remains steadfastly focused on further growth in innovation, creativity and technology.

collopy.jpg
ho-alan.jpg

Daniel Collopy

Alan Ho


Spruson & Ferguson (Asia) Pte Ltd152 Beach Road#37-05/06 Gateway EastSingapore 189721Tel: +65 6333 7200Fax: +65 6333 7222mail.asia@spruson.comwww.spruson.com

more from across site and SHARED ros bottom lb

More from across our site

Eight years after its launch, members of the Australian patent firm’s Singapore office explain its growth strategy over the past year
Lawyers at Bowmans Kenya discuss the digital blind spots posed by the transition from physical ledgers to cloud databases and digital co-development models
The Powell Gilbert co-founder discusses the confidence required to launch a firm, building an enduring patent litigation practice and why developing the next generation has changed her measure of success
Cabinet M Oproiu’s Raluca Vasilescu explains why AI is changing what clients expect from patent attorneys, where the technology is overhyped and what the next generation will need to do differently
As clients demand more flexible fees and AI-driven efficiencies, IP firms are rethinking pricing without abandoning the value of their work
HG Law was formed largely by ex Fish & Neave lawyers who left after the latter's merger with Ropes & Gray; now those experiences are shaping its latest combination
David Rodrigues and Evan Lazerowitz – attorneys at Robinson & Cole – offer practical guidance on the steps a business might consider to preserve and maximise IP value before entering financial distress or insolvency
Daniel Law CEO Alicia Daniel-Shores may have stepped into a family business, but she has spent two decades building her own vision around technology and litigation
Law firms don't particularly like saying no to clients. Perhaps they should get better at it
The office, which has a relatively new patent litigation team as well as a wider ‘soft’ IP offering, would remain independent if the rejection is rubberstamped
Gift this article